Laserfiche WebLink
<br />High Country News -- Printable -- February 21, 1994: Las Vegas wheels and deals for Co... Page 2 of6 <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />David Donnelly, chief engineer for the water authority, is also openly disdainful of the <br />importation project that he defended until recently. "Frankly, it doesn't make any sens . We <br />don't want to build any more darns, reservoirs, or construction projects. We want to do <br />things that cost less and that are more politically, socially and environmentally accepta Ie." <br /> <br />With the groundwater project - a traditional approach to a city's need for water - out 0 the <br />way for the moment, Mulroy and her colleagues now see Las Vegas as a major player n the <br />Colorado River. Last year, she took her message to Washington, D.C., as the first chai an <br />ofthe Western Urban Water Coalition, a new lobbying group for cities seeking a great r <br />share of water in the West. <br /> <br />Western water attracts visionaries. Some pursue mirages; others prove to be ahead of t eir <br />time. And there are a few who figure out how to get what they want from the changes hey <br />see commg. <br /> <br />Patricia Mulroy may be one ofthe practical visionaries of the post-reclamation era. Sh <br />appears to understand where reform of Western water is headed: away from new <br />construction projects and toward better management of rivers and ecosystems. She wa ched <br />Denver's Two Forks Dam proposal go down to defeat. Closer to home, she saw South rn <br />California fail to get its peripheral canal. From those lessons, she has corne up with an <br />alternative to a massive construction and dewatering project. <br /> <br />Mulroy says that if Nevada can add 200,000 to 250,000 acre-feet of Colorado River w ter to <br />the state's current annual allocation of 300,000 acre-feet from the Colorado River, the she <br />will recommend dropping the agency's claims on rural Nevada water. Those claims ar for <br />about 200,000 acre-feet. <br /> <br />Mulroy says the water needed to supply the next century of growth in southern Nevad is <br />not a major amount, given the allocations to other states on the Colorado River. But to get <br />there, she acknowledges, will require "major rethinking" up and down the river. <br /> <br />The 1922 Colorado River Compact - a major strand in the web of interstate compacts, <br />legislation, regulations, court decisions and rules collectively known as the "law of th <br />_ allots 7.5 million acre-feet of water annually to the upper-basin states of Colorado, <br />Wyoming, Utah and New Mexico, and 7.5 million to the lower basin states of Nevada <br />Arizona and California. Of that, California gets 4.4 million acre-feet, Arizona gets 2.8 <br />million acre-feet, and Nevada gets 300,000 acre-feet. Most of California's and Arizon 's <br />Colorado River water goes to agriculture, as does the upper-basin's water. <br /> <br /> <br />Those allocations made sense when the 1922 compact was signed, and when the West was <br />seen as a potential agricultural powerhouse if it only had water. But today irrigated <br />agriculture is on the defensive. <br /> <br />In California, for example, Rep. George Miller helped put together a coalition of urb <br />interests and environmentalists that pushed a major water reform bill through the Con <br />in 1992, despite intense opposition from California agricultural interests. That reform <br />make it easier for cities to buy up agricultural water. <br /> <br />Southern Nevada, an overwhelmingly urban area, has essentially no irrigated agricul <br /> <br /> <br />http://www.hcn.org/servletslhcn.PrintableArticle?article _id= 118 <br /> <br />9/1212006 <br />