My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00156
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
PUB00156
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:24:34 AM
Creation date
1/18/2008 1:02:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2006
Title
Sharing Colorado River
CWCB Section
Administration
Author
Joe Gelt
Description
Sharing Colorado River
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Water markets can mean an end to water shortages <br /> <br />age 21 of27 <br /> <br />environmental and fiscal constraints. But if progress <br />toward greater reliance on markets continues, water <br />supplies and efficiency will increase as users trade <br />with one another, and consumption will be tamed <br />by higher prices. ; <br /> <br />Today in the western United States, water rights <br />have come full circle. From private property rights <br />freely transferable like any other property on the <br />western frontier, they became public rights <br />governed by legislatures and courts. Now they are <br />becoming tradable property rights once again. <br />States and the federal government, recognizing the <br />practicality of markets for reallocating water, are <br />taking steps to liberate water rights from <br />burdensome rules and regulations. Although the <br />"water is public" and "water is unique" paradigms <br />remain strong, irrigators, environmentalists, urban <br />dwellers, and other water users are overcoming <br />obstacles to markets with innovative arrangements <br />involving voluntary transactions. <br /> <br />Notes <br /> <br />1. An acre-foot is the amount of water necessary to <br />cover an acre of land one foot deep, approximately <br />326,000 gallons. <br /> <br />2. Today all ten states have either repealed these <br />bans or riddled them with exceptions (Thompson <br />1996,3). <br /> <br />3. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. <br />Rocky Mountain Power Company, 406 Pacific <br />Reporter 2d 798, 800 (1965). <br /> <br />4. The law, Mont. Code Ann. 85-2-104, was <br />repealed in 1985, most likely in response to <br />Sporhase v. Nebraska ex rei, Douglas, 458 U.S. <br />941, 102 S.Ct. 3456, 73 L.Ed.2d 1254 (1982), in <br />which the United States Supreme Court held that <br />the Commerce Clause generally prohibits states <br />from discriminating against other states in their <br />water allocation. <br /> <br />5.207 U.S. 564, 28 S.Ct. 207, 52 L.Ed. 340 (1908). <br /> <br />6. The irrigation subsidy provided by the federal <br /> <br />http://www . perc.orglpublications/policyseries/priming_ full. php ?s=2 <br /> <br />9/1212006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.