Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Mountain Reservoir provide a substantial amount of storage water and/or have been <br />reoperated to benefit the fish. The same is true for Navajo Reservoir in the San Juan <br />Program. <br /> <br />3. Major portions of both the Upper Basin Program annual operating budget and the <br />capital budget are derived from the sale ofCRSP hydroelectric power. If Lake Powell <br />were to drop below the minimum elevation necessary to produce hydroelectric <br />power, the Upper Basin Program and the water projects that rely on the program <br />would be in serious trouble. <br /> <br />4. The Upper Basin Program only provides certainty for Upper Basin water uses to the <br />extent it is successful. We must make continued progress toward recovery of the <br />listed fish species or all bets are off. <br /> <br />Glen Canyon Dam is facing a separate and challenging set of environmental issues. There <br />are both ESA issues and general river and riparian area habitat issues in the Grand Canyon below <br />Glen Canyon Dam. The Grand Canyon Protection Act passed by Congress in 1992135 set up an <br />Adaptive Management Pro gram 136 or AMP. The AMP is a multi-disciplinary and multi-agency <br />program to address environmental issues through the Grand Canyon. <br /> <br />In late 2006, Reclamation initiated the preparation of an EIS on what is being referred to as <br />the Long-Term Experimental Plan (L TEP). The website states that the "proposed plan would <br />implement a structured, long term program of experimental (including dam operations, potential <br />modifications to Glen Canyon Dam intake structures, and their potential management actions, such <br />as removal of non-native fish species) in the Colorado River below Glen Canyon Dam." <br /> <br />Growth and Water Use in the Colorado River Basin <br /> <br />Initially, the growth in water demands was the result of irrigated agriculture. However, since <br />1960 and especially since the late 1980s, population growth throughout the Colorado River Basin <br />has been explosive. In 1960 when Arizona was fighting with California over water rights to support, <br />it had a population of just over 1.3 million people. By 2000, its population had reached 5.13 million <br />people and by 2030 Arizona is projected to have reached a staggering 10.7 million people! 137 <br /> <br />Arizona's water use presents a different picture. In 1970, the year from which data on water <br />are available from the Consumptive Uses and Losses Report, Arizona used 4,756,000 af'38 In 2000, <br />the last year for which published data is available, Arizona used 4,791,000 af, virtually the same as <br />1970. The water use figures include mainstem uses, tributary uses and groundwater uses. The <br /> <br />135 Public Law 102-575. (1992). <br /> <br />136 See www.usbr.gov/ud/rrnlamo/background. <br /> <br />137All of the population data was obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau website. <br /> <br />138 All of the consumptive use data is from the Consumptive Uses and Losses Report available on the USBR website. <br /> <br />Page -52- <br />