My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00155
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
PUB00155
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:24:22 AM
Creation date
1/18/2008 1:00:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2007
Title
The Colorado River The Story of a Quest for Certainty on a Diminishing River
CWCB Section
Administration
Author
Eric Kuhn
Description
The Colorado River The Story of a Quest for Certainty on a Diminishing River
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The first transmountain diversions were gravity ditches like the Berthoud Pass Ditch and <br />Grand River Ditch. Construction on the Grand River Ditch began in the 1890s. <br /> <br />In 1929, the Denver Board of Water Commissioners entered into a contract with the Moffat <br />Tunnel Improvement District to lease the pioneer or pilot bore tunnel of the Moffat Railroad Tunnel. <br />Denver lined the tunnel and, in 1936, began using it to divert water from the Fraser River Basin, a <br />tributary of the Colorado River, to the Front Range.91 <br /> <br />Efforts to construct the Colorado-Big Thompson Project (C-BT Project) began in 1933 when <br />Royce Tipton was hired to make a report on a transmountain diversion from Grand Lake. This effort <br />would lead to the formation of the Northern Colorado Water Users Association (NCWUA) in 1934 <br />and the West Slope Protective Association (WSPA) about the same time. <br /> <br />In June 1934, the Upper Basin States got together with the Bureau of Reclamation in Denver, <br />Colorado. The states agreed to the following statement:92 <br /> <br />"We favor the negotiation of an Interstate Compact among the four <br />upper states of the Colorado River Basin at the earliest possible date. <br />In the meantime it is our belief that each state should go ahead with <br />its development without objection by other states, as contemplated by <br />the Colorado River Compact, unless the development, in addition to <br />already existing water uses, would in the opinion of such other states <br />or any of them, be considered as approaching too nearly the equitable <br />share of water that under compact might eventually be apportioned to <br />such state out of the waters involved." <br /> <br />This policy agreement allowed development to proceed in the Upper Basin. The primary <br />development was in Colorado and it involved additional transmountain diversions. <br /> <br />In 1937 the NCWUA and WSPA would reach an agreement to allow for the Congressional <br />authorization and construction of the C-BT Project.93 The NCW A would become the Northern <br />Colorado Water Conservancy District and the WSP A would become the Colorado River Water <br />Conservation District. <br /> <br />The East Slope/West Slope compromise is embodied in Senate Document 80 (SD-80), <br />seventieth-fifth Congress, First Session. The SD-80 compromise was based on a set of principles <br />adopted by the Water Subcommittee of the Colorado Planning Commission in 1936. <br /> <br />91 The Moffat Water Tunnel Project, An Achievement in Denver's Metropolitan Development Program, City of Denver, June 10, <br />1936. <br /> <br />92 Breitenstein, page 67. <br /> <br />93 The history ofthe C-BT Project is beyond the scope of this paper. The reader should refer to "The Last Water Hole in the West" <br />by Daniel Tyler, University of Colorado Press, 1992. <br /> <br />Page -31- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.