Laserfiche WebLink
<br />oj <br /> <br />Does Colorado Reallv Have Surplus Colorado River Water Available? <br /> <br />As both the interstate and intrastate discussions proceed, we need to recognize and discuss <br />the major uncertainties and challenges facing the Colorado River. Climate change or "global <br />warming" raises serious new uncertainty factors on a system that seeks to minimize uncertainty. <br />Almost all of the science that I have read suggests that the Colorado River is facing a future with less <br />stream flow. A recent National Academies of Sciences report makes the same conclusion. 16 <br />Additionally, there have been a number of paleohydrology studies that suggest the 1900s may have <br />been unusually wet. Therefore, even without the climate change factor, there may be cause for <br />concern. The policy implications of less water in the Colorado River are very disturbing, not only <br />for the State of Colorado and its sister Basin States but for the nation as a whole. <br /> <br />The policy implications ofless water go far beyond the use of water for consumptive uses. <br />It will have serious implications for the interagency efforts to protect and recover any endangered <br />species throughout the Colorado River Basin. Indeed, the reduced flows may trigger the listing of <br />additional species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). <br /> <br />Reduced flows may have serious impacts on both stream based and reservoir based recreation <br />throughout the Basin. A warmer Colorado River Basin may change the vegetation in the Colorado <br />River watershed in ways we cannot predict. There may well be new water quality problems from <br />the reduced flows and changes in the shape and timing of the hydro graph. <br /> <br />If we assume that today' s Colorado River is being fully utilized by the seven Basin States and <br />Mexico, then a future with less water will mean that all future new uses will come through the <br />transfer or restriction of existing uses, through efficiency improvements or through augmentation <br />from sources outside the Colorado River Basin or precipitation enchancement. Less water in the <br />river will mean that shortages in the Lower Basin will be the rule not the exception. It means that <br />within Colorado, we are going to have to carefully consider any decisions concerning future <br />development. Is the basic assumption underlying SWSI that Colorado has remaining Colorado River <br />water to develop still valid? <br /> <br />Author's Note and Motivation for the Paper <br /> <br />As previously mentioned, I believe the people of Colorado are facing very difficult decisions <br />concerning our water future. It is my view that if HB-Il 77 is to succeed, the professional water <br />community needs to encourage a broad and transparent statewide dialogue among the community <br />itself, the numerous elected and appointed officials on the boards, commissions, city and town <br />councils, the legislature and the public. <br /> <br />16NationaI Research Council of the National Academies. Colorado River Basin Water Management, Evaluating and Adjusting to <br />Hydroclimatic Varability, February 2007. Available through www.nap,edu. <br /> <br />Page -7- <br />