My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00148
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
PUB00148
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:18:42 AM
Creation date
1/18/2008 12:38:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1978
Title
The Colorado Water Study Directions for the Future
CWCB Section
Administration
Description
The Colorado Water Study Directions for the Future
Publications - Doc Type
Historical
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
793
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />rights-of-way on payment of damages. Wells, who was to play an <br />important role in the Constitutional Convention, rejected this <br />approach, asserting that "the right springs out of necessity and <br />existed before the statute was enacted, and would still survive <br />though the statute were repealed."s6 <br /> <br />5. The Constitutional Convention: Background. <br /> <br />The 15 years following the adoption of the first water right <br />statute by the legislature of Jefferson Territory in 1861 saw a <br />great increase in the agricultural economy of the state and the use <br />of water for irrigation purposes.57 The small, haphazard diversions <br />by individual farmers were giving way to cooperative efforts by <br />groups of settlers and large diversions by orgahized ditch companies. <br />The development of the water resources of the state was perceived to <br />be the key to its economic success. <br /> <br />In 1873, Governor Elbert called a convention of governors of <br />states in the arid region to discuss ways to encourage the con- <br />struction of large canals and reservoirs on its own lands. Develop- <br />ment was hampered for a time by the Panic of 1873 and the depression <br />which continued through the next four years. <br /> <br />One of the most important developments in irrigated agriculture <br />in Colorado was the establishment of the community of Greeley by <br />Nathan C. Meeker" and his Union Colony on the banks of the Cache la <br />Poudre River.59 This was a cooperative undertaking involving the <br />pooled resources of all colony members, a factor which permitted the <br />construction of large irrigation canals. One of these ditches, known <br />as Colony Canal No.2, was completed in 1872 and was the largest <br />diversion on the Poudre at that time. <br /> <br />The Union Colony was highly successful in the 1872 growing <br />season. In that year a similar venture was undertaken at Fort <br />Collins 25 miles upstream on the Poudre. This Agricultural Colony, <br />as it was known, built two large canals of its own and began to <br />divert water out of the stream. <br /> <br />The inevitable conflict between these two groups was precipi- <br />tated by a severe drought in 1874. During that summer the farmers <br />in Greeley found that there was not enough water in the Poudre to <br />fill both of their canals. They knew where the water was going. <br />Meeker's Greeley Tribune demanded recognition of the right of prior <br />appropriation and the creation of a river superintendent to divide <br />the water according to the prior rights of all users.60 Meeker felt <br />that these steps were necessary in order to protect the investments <br />of his colony and to assure the economic development of the area. <br /> <br />l1-8 <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.