24 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Findings -Water Conservation Planning and Programs ~ 48 percent of Colorado utilities either had a water conservation plan or were in progress de~~eloping one. But a similar number of agencies (48 percent) did not ha~~e a conservation plan on the books or in progress. ~ It was small utilities that did not ha~~e a conservation plan. Only 8 percent of the population resides in an area not covered by a conservation plan. ~ Conservation planning acti~~ities ha~~e accelerated in recent years. More than 70 percent of the existing and pending conservation plans in Colorado were completed since 2004. ~ Only 30 percent of respondents had a water conservation program budget, nearly 70 percent did not. ~ The total utility funding for water conservation in Colorado in 2007 was $11,224,500. However, $8,000,000 of this came from a single agency. ~ The median conservation program budget was $25,000 so half of the programs in the state had a budget smaller than $25,000. ~ The importance of offsetting the increased demand of future growth through conservation was rated at an average of 3.4 on a scale where 1 is not at all important and 5 is extremely important. ~ The most popular conservation program tool was residential indoor audits and leak detection. This type of program was implemented at 35 percent of the responding agencies. Incenti~~es for the purchase of efficient toilets were implemented at 22 percent and showerhead and clothes washer programs at 17 and 15 percent respectively. Findings -Climate Change and Long Term Planning ~ Sixty percent of the agencies surveyed had water supply master plans for raw and/or treated water and 35 percent did not ha~~e such plans. This result was identical to what was found in the 2003 survey. ~ Generally the prevalence of water supply master plans in 2007 is evenly spread across Colorado's se~~en water divisions (between 50 and 65 percent had a long range plan), but Di~~ision 3 -Rio Grande - had a significant lower rate of supply master planning. ~ The availability of new supplies, peak demands, population change, changes in usage patterns, and drought recurrence topped the list of considerations for water utilities when conducting long term supply planning.