My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
16 (3)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
16 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:35:51 PM
Creation date
1/17/2008 4:40:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/23/2008
Description
ISF Section - Proposed terms and conditions, Jackson County 2008 New Appropriations
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
For example, the United States entered into an Agreement for Administration of Water Pursuant <br />to the Subordination of the Wayne N. Aspinall Unit Water Rights within the Upper Gunnison <br />River Basin dated June 1, 2000 (the "Aspinall Subordination Agreement"). Recently, the State <br />of Colorado supported Stipulations for Withdrawal that recognize the Aspinall Subordination <br />Agreement in Case No. O1 CWOS in Water Division 4. There, the Stipulations were deemed not <br />to be a selective subordination because they gave effect to the Aspinall Subordination Agreement <br />and the State and Division Engineers could, in essence, account for the water as the first 60,000 <br />acre feet of water attributable to the Aspinall Unit Water Rights. <br />Here, the proposed stipulation simply gives effect to the Supreme Court Decree. And, because <br />the Supreme Court Decree applies to the entire basin, the administration of water rights in the <br />basin should be no additional hindrance to the State and Division Engineer. <br />Finally, the CWCB has entered into even more restrictive stipulations on Yellowjacket Canyon <br />Creek to protect historic and future use in Case Nos. 06CW60 and 06CW61 in Water Division 7. <br />Conclusion <br />For all of the reasons above, the District would be willing to withdraw its opposition to the <br />appropriation of instream flows on Indian Creek and the North Fork of the North Platte in <br />Jackson County provided the above-referenced stipulation language is incorporated into any <br />such decrees. In addition, if the CWCB determines to proceed with the consideration of the <br />proposed instream flow appropriation on the South Fork of Big Creek before crafting a state- <br />wide policy with regard to instream flow appropriations that terminate at the state line, the <br />District would be willing to consider withdrawing its apposition to the appropriation of an <br />instream flow on this segment provided the above-referenced stipulation language is also <br />incorporated into any such decree for this segment. <br />Thank you for your attention. We look forward to discussing this issue with you. Please do <br />not hesitate to contact me at (970) 723-4660 at your earliest convenience. <br />Sincerely, <br />Kent Crowder <br />President <br />cc: Jackson County Water Conservancy District Board <br />Board of County Commissioners of Jackson County <br />Dan McAuliffe, Acting Director, CWCB <br />Kent Holsinger, Holsinger Law, LLC <br />Thomas R. Sharp, Sharp, Steinke, Sherman & Engle, LLC <br />Ken Knox, Office of the State Engineer <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.