My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11d
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
11d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2010 3:15:27 PM
Creation date
1/17/2008 4:29:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/22/2008
Description
CF Section – Construction Fund and Severance Tax Trust Fund Perpetual Base Account – New Loans - Republican River Water Conservation District - Republican River Compact Compliance Pipeline Project
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Republican River Water Conselvation District <br />January14,2008 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br /> <br />Agenda Item lId <br /> <br />Water Rights <br /> <br />At the time of the loan application the District did not own rights to ground water that could be used for the <br />Project. The preferred alternative described below is to acquire existing rights to designated ground water <br />and to transfer the historical consumptive use of those rights to new wells that will be conveyed by the <br />pipeline to meet Compact obligations. <br /> <br />In 1978, withdrawals of ground water in the Basin reached 1,040,000 AF/yr and in 2005 it was <br />approximately 750,000 AF /yr. Impacts from ground water diversions in Colorado included in the <br />Republican River Compact Administration - Compact Accounting averaged 25,370 AF /yr over the period <br />2002-2006. These impacts are primarily due to ground water diversions that occurred decades ago. <br /> <br />Statting in 2003, Colorado has exceeded its compact allocations by an average of 11,350 AF /yr. Some <br />reduction in the amount that Colorado has exceeded its compact allocations is expected in the future as the <br />result of irrigated acreage retirement programs. However, it is projected that the deficit will increase <br />gradually to 15,000 AF in 2039. The expected yield ofthe Project is 15,000 AF/yr, which should be adequate <br />to ensure compact compliance for the 20-year period of the CWCB loan. <br /> <br />Ogallala Aquifer - The Republican River Basin overlies the Ogallala Aquifer, a regional underground <br />aquifer system underlying pOltions of seven states from South Dakota to the Texas panhandle, including <br />portions of the Republican River Basin in Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas. In 1966 the Ogallala Aquifer in <br />the Republican River Basin in Colorado was included in the Northern High Plains (NHP) Designated <br />Ground Water Basin. At that time, there was limited well development in the basin. However, <br />improvements in center pivot sprinkler irrigation systems allowed the development of land that was more <br />difficult to irrigate with t100d irrigation methods, and approximately 4,000 permits have been issued within <br />the NHP Basin. Issuance of permits in the basin slowed during the 1980s and essentially ceased by 1990. <br />The GWC recognized that there was limited recharge to the Ogallala Aquifer in the basin relative to the large <br />amount of water in storage in the aquifer and authorized controlled mining of ground water in the basin <br />based on a rate of depletion of 40% over 25 years. This was later amended to be 40% over 100 years. <br /> <br />In 1974, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that ground water taking over a century to reach a stream was <br />not subject to appropriation under the Colorado Constitution and could be managed separately as a <br />designated ground water basin. At that time, no one thought that the Ogallala Aquifer had been appOltioned <br />by the Republican River Compact or that withdrawals from the aquifer were subject to the Compact. <br /> <br />Project Description <br /> <br />The Stipulation allows the acquisition or construction of wells for the purpose of offsetting stream depletions <br />in order to comply with a State's compact allocations, provided that such wells do not cause any new net <br />depletion to stream flow either annually or long-tetro. The Stipulation also provides that augmentation plans <br />and related accounting procedures shall be approved by the Compact Administration prior to <br />implementation. <br /> <br />Analysis of Alternatives <br /> <br />1. No action. <br /> <br />2. Purchase existing rights to designated ground water and transfer the historical consumptive use of those <br />rights to Compact compliance. <br /> <br />3. Construct new wells based on new appropriations and/or amendments to the GWC rules and regulations <br />to provide a water supply for Compact compliance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.