My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
23 (3)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
23 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:37:28 PM
Creation date
1/16/2008 1:20:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/14/2007
Description
WSP Section - Request for Expenditure for Republican River Compact Litigation
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
lt4,',. ~ ~~~ <br />IN I }, ,: ,, j C, I! <br />~, ,t t.; <br />~\, 11 `y y~~~ ,,:, <br />~ ~ ~/ <br />1p~o~. <br />ATTORNEY GENERAL OF COLORADO <br />John W. Bothers <br />October 26, 2007 <br />Request for Expenditure from Litigation Fund <br />for Republican River Compact Litigation <br />Dear N(embers of the Colorado ~~'ater Conservation Board: <br />By this letter, I request the expenditure of $2~I0,000 over the current and next fiscal <br />years (FY08 and FY'09) from the Water Conservation Board Litigation Fund (Boardl <br />pursuant to section 3?-GO-121(2.5)(a)(lIi), C`. R.S. That section authorizes the Board to <br />expend money ft-om the Litigation Fund at the request of the Attorney General for the; costs <br />to defend and protect C'oluradc>'s allocations ofwater in interstate streams and rivers. <br />believe this expenditure is necessary to adequately defend, in negotiations and litigation, <br />C'olorado's interests in the Republican River. <br />The recent multi-year drought and increasing interstate and intrastate demands on the <br />Republican River have had a dramatic effect on irrigation within the basin. In 2003, a <br />settlement decree was entered into to resolve the interstate litigation on the Republican River, <br />It"cr,rsns v. NE~hraskcr acrd C'olor•rrdo, !'4'v. 1?~ (h•igirrc7l. As a result, Colorado has retired <br />thousands of acres of irrigated land and taken additional actions such as the partial draining <br />ofi Bonny Reservoir. Also, Colorado is developing enforcement rules and exploring <br />additional actions that we will need to undertake to comply with the settlement decree. <br />Recently, the Kansas Attorney General indicated that the States of Nebraska and Colorado <br />arc not doing enough to compc3rt with the settlcmtr~t decree, and that Kansas intends to <br />initiate litigation against those States to enforce the decree. The State of Colorado must be <br />prepareci to curtail its uses, and also defend the State's intrrest in the litigation that is <br />looming. <br />We anticipate that shortly after the begim~ing of the; year, Kansas may file complaint <br />with the United States Supreme Court against Colorado claiming we have consumed rnorc <br />water in the Republican River basin than allo~~ed by the C'on~pact. Similar claims will he <br />made ~rgainst Nebraska. ~~'e also anticipate crass-claims from Nebraska alleging that <br />('crlorado's over consumption of«atcr injured Nebraska or contributed to Nebraska's over <br />use. These requested funds will be used to pay for litigation expenses, including experts to <br />bolster Colorado's position in the case. <br />State Services Building • 1525 Sherman Street 7~h Floor • Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone (303) 866-3557 • FAX (303) 866-4745 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.