Laserfiche WebLink
Section 6 <br />Implementation and Recommendations for Colorado's Water Supply Future <br />Water Supply Planning and Finance <br />This Section of the CWCB manages the Construction <br />Fund and Severance Tax Trust Fund Perpetual Base <br />funds. The Board must <br />Highlights: I manage the funds to meet <br />• Construction Fund operational <br />• Severance Tax Trust requirements, the <br />Fund demand for loans and <br />• Water Partnering non-reimbursable <br />Projects <br />investments. Currently <br />only the Construction <br />Fund can be used to pay for operational and non- <br />reimbursable investment expenses. Obtaining the <br />ability to manage the Perpetual Base Account <br />conjunctively with Construction Funds will help <br />address long-terms needs. <br />The Section bas been challenged to defend the <br />CW CB's financial resources and ensure that funds are <br />not used for purposes unrelated to the CWCB's <br />statutory authorizations. <br />If the Board is to be successful in meeting the needs <br />identified by SWSI it must have the ability to remain <br />flexible and its funding sources must be protected, for <br />without stable and reliable financing, none of the <br />projects or programs identified can be implemented. <br />efficiency in municipal water planning. Successes <br />include: <br />~ Reaching consensus on how conservation may <br />affect system reliability under various scenarios. <br />~ Quantification of potential long-term savings <br />available from conservation measures. <br />~ Development of a range of potential water <br />conservation savings from select measures that <br />were in a comparable range to potential water <br />conservation savings identified in the SW SI report. <br />~ Common understanding on reaching some issues. <br />Limited progress was made on agricultural water <br />efficiency and this remains a significant challenge. <br />Based on initial work, there appears to be some <br />opportunities to achieve additional efficiencies in <br />agricultural water use. However, since agricultural <br />return flows are used by downstream water users, at <br />a watershed level there are significant limitations in <br />the overall net potential savings that can be realized. <br />Nevertheless, since agricultural water use accounts <br />for over 85 percent of total water use in the state, <br />follow-up efforts should include this group of water <br />users. This issue is discussed in Section 3 of this <br />report. <br />New Program Initiatives and Highlights <br />Input from CWCB Board and DNR from the CWCB <br />Board meeting on November 14, 2007. <br />6.2 SWSI Phase 2 TRT <br />Recommendations <br />This section recaps the various TRT <br />recommendations. <br />6.2.1 Conservation and Efficiency <br />TRT <br />As its mission, the M~SCI Water Conservation TRT set <br />out to "develop a deeper understanding and greater <br />consensus on conservation and efficiency for <br />municipal, industrial, and agricultural water uses." In <br />the category of urban water demand, the TRT made <br />significant advances that forward our understanding <br />of the important role of water conservation and <br />In addition the impacts of climate variability on water <br />conservation and system reliability have not been <br />addressed by this TRT. <br />The following conclusions and recommendations are <br />made by CWCB staff after a review of the Water <br />Conservation and Efficiency TRT efforts. The primary <br />areas where there is a lack of consensus among TRT <br />members is on the successful implementation of some <br />of the conservation measures, especially turf <br />replacement and the role of water conservation in <br />eliminating the need for structural projects and <br />processes that water providers have planned to meet <br />future water demands. <br />PRELIMINARY DRAFT 6-9 <br />