My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Section5_Gap_11-7-07
CWCB
>
SWSI II Technical Roundtables
>
DayForward
>
Section5_Gap_11-7-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 10:29:57 AM
Creation date
1/10/2008 2:08:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI II Technical Roundtables
Title
SWSI Phase 2 Report - Section 5 Addressing the Water Supply Gap Technical Roundtable
Date
11/7/2007
Author
CWCB
SWSI II - Doc Type
Final Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 5 <br />Addressing the Water Supply Gap Technical Roundtable <br />It was emphasized that all water supply solutions <br />be considered. Solutions and alternatives should be <br />analyzed and evaluated for both in-basin and <br />transbasin concepts. Water conservation/demand <br />management and transfer from existing uses <br />(agriculture) should also be considered. <br />The following outcomes/products were to be <br />produced as part of the Addressing the Gap TRT: <br />~ Development of a range of alternatives that could <br />be organized into thematic alternatives (i.e., <br />conservation, agricultural transfer, and water <br />storage). <br />~ Examination of reconnaissance level yields for <br />alternatives. <br />~ Conceptual level costs for alternatives examined. <br />~ Benefits of alternatives examined. <br />~ Implementation issues of alternatives examined. <br />A finite number of alternatives were examined and a <br />balance between the number of alternatives and the <br />level of detail in the analyses was considered. <br />~ Identifying how alternatives could be developed/ <br />operated in a manner that would benefit both the <br />area where the water is diverted and the area <br />where it is put to beneficial use. <br />~ Showing tradeoffs between alternatives and <br />potential benefits of collaboration and joint <br />operations. <br />Promote Cost Effectiveness <br />Provide for Operational <br />Flexibility <br />Comply with All Applicable Laws, <br />Regulations, and Water Rights <br />Figure 5-1 <br />SWSI Objectives <br />The TRT served as an initial forum to develop, <br />refine, and discuss the alternatives. The <br />development of the alternatives focused on: <br />~ Identifying where collaboration between basins <br />and within basins would create the greatest <br />benefits. <br />~ Addressing the most critical water shortage <br />areas. <br />Defining the Gap <br />The SWSI report found that population in Colorado <br />will increase, on both the east and west slopes, with <br />the majority of growth occurring on the east slope, <br />though population growth rates are higher in many <br />west slope basins. Table 5-1 summarizes the <br />population trends in each basin and Figure 5-2 <br />shows by the year 2030 water demand is projected <br />to increase by an additiona1630,000 AF. <br />Sustainably Meet Municipal & <br />Industrial Demands <br />Optimize Existing.. and Future <br />Water Supplies <br />Enhance Recreational <br />Opportunities <br />FINAL DRAFT 5-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.