My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Section5_Gap_11-7-07
CWCB
>
SWSI II Technical Roundtables
>
DayForward
>
Section5_Gap_11-7-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 10:29:57 AM
Creation date
1/10/2008 2:08:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI II Technical Roundtables
Title
SWSI Phase 2 Report - Section 5 Addressing the Water Supply Gap Technical Roundtable
Date
11/7/2007
Author
CWCB
SWSI II - Doc Type
Final Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 5 <br />Addressing the Water Supply Gap Technical Roundtable <br />Raw <br />~5~1'8 <br />Potable <br />M&I Use <br />Figure 5-17 <br />Schematic of Conjunctive Use of Surface Water and Groundwater/ASR <br />Conceptual layouts of piping infrastructure for the <br />South Platte could run from the Greeley, Weldona <br />or Sterling areas north to the South Metro Gap area <br />as depicted in Figure 5-18. This route could allow a <br />tie-in to existing and planned pipelines from the <br />Brighton area to the South Metro area. Elevation <br />profiles for the conceptual pipeline alignments were <br />developed and are shown in Figure 5-19. The total <br />elevation gain for the South Platte pipeline <br />alignments to the South Metro gap area vary from <br />approximately 1,500 to 2,100 feet, depending on the <br />intake and ending locations. <br />Conceptual layouts of an Arkansas pumpback are <br />shown from Avondale, Boone and LaJunta north to <br />the El Paso county gap area as shown in Figure 5-20. <br />It may be possible to exchange water upstream and <br />divert higher quality water at upstream locations. <br />Elevation profiles for the pipeline alignments were <br />developed and are shown in Figure 5-21. The <br />elevation gain for the Arkansas pipeline alignments <br />vary from approximately 2,000 to 3,500 feet, <br />depending upon starting and ending location. <br />The following are some of the key considerations <br />when examining the project elements, benefits, <br />potential implementation issues and potential <br />attributes for this alternative. <br />Project Elements-Lower South <br />Platte/Arkansas Pumpback Option <br />~ Can accommodate a traditional or alternative <br />agricultural transfer. <br />~ Pipeline and pumping from lower South Platte to <br />South Metro area, and from the Arkansas to <br />northern El Paso County and other areas. <br />~ Storage would be required at both ends of the <br />pipeline in order to provide for firm annual yield <br />and maximize the use of pipe and pumping <br />infrastructure capacity by delivering water on a <br />full pipe baseload basis. <br />~ Alluvial pretreatment (bank filtration) is <br />assumed as a pretreatment step for organics <br />removal and to precondition the water for <br />advanced membrane processes such as reverse <br />osmosis. <br />~ Advanced water treatment (reverse osmosis) <br />would be required to remove total dissolved <br />solids and other constituents and there would be <br />associated high capital and O~eM costs for <br />advanced water treatment and the disposal of the <br />water treatment waste stream concentrate. <br />5-24 FINAL DRAFT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.