My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Section4_Rec-EnvWithFigs
CWCB
>
SWSI II Technical Roundtables
>
DayForward
>
Section4_Rec-EnvWithFigs
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 10:29:55 AM
Creation date
1/10/2008 1:57:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI II Technical Roundtables
Title
SWSI Phase 2 Report - Section 4 Delineating and Prioritizing Colorado's Environmental and Recreational Resources and Needs
Date
11/7/2007
Author
CWCB
SWSI II - Doc Type
Final Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 4 <br />Delineating and Prioritizing Colorado's Environmental and Recreational Resources and Needs <br />Financial <br />Steve Harris (Chair) Jeff Crane <br />Jeff Baessler Reed Dills <br />Bill Baum Chuck Wanner <br />Peter Butler John Wiener <br />Legal/Water Rights/Institutional/Political <br />Taylor Hawes (Chair) <br />Mark Pifher (Chair) <br />Linda Bassi <br />Bill Baum <br />Barbara Biggs <br />Travis Bray <br />Jack Gyers <br />Steve Glazer <br />Dave Graf <br />Steve Harris <br />Ted Kowalski <br />Ken Neubecker <br />Rick Sackbauer <br />Karen Shirley <br />Albert Slap <br />Patrick Tooley <br />Chuck Wanner <br />Patrick Wells <br />Lane Wyatt <br />Figure 4-2 <br />Subcommittee Members <br />4.3 Technical Subcommittee <br />4.3.1 Focus of Subcommittee <br />The following technical questions were addressed <br />by the Technical Subcommittee: <br />1. What are examples of projects (or programs) <br />that benefit multiple users that could serve as a <br />model for the state? <br />2. Can we develop geographic coverages of <br />environment and recreation attributes that <br />would help basins prioritize key river and <br />wetland resources? <br />3. How can Conserve, Protect, Restore priorities <br />be implemented and integrated into a <br />prioritization process and how might that <br />process interface with the ISF program? <br />Efforts to address the three questions are discussed <br />in the following subsections, respectively: <br />4.3.2 Geographic Coverages <br />To address the second question, the technical <br />subcommittee decided that mapping the <br />distribution of select environment and recreation <br />"attributes" was a key tool to begin identifying <br />priority areas. Table 4-1 lists the GIS coverages for <br />the attributes developed by the technical <br />subcommittee. These coverages are shown as <br />Figures 4-3 through 4-28 at the end of this section. A <br />description of the types of coverages and the method <br />for generating them can be found in the following <br />subsections. Each of these coverages was chosen for <br />its potential to allow decisionmakers to determine <br />areas of priority. <br />~ Section 4.6 Overview of Select En~~ironmental <br />and Recreational Projects describes examples <br />of select case studies and options to address <br />environment and recreation projects brought up <br />by all three subcommittees. <br />~ Section 4.3.2 Geographic Coverages describes <br />the geographic coverages that could be used to <br />help prioritize environment and recreation areas. <br />~ Section 43.3 Prioritization Process describes <br />the identification, prioritization, and <br />quantification process for environment and <br />recreation needs. <br />FINAL DRAFT 4-5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.