My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Section3_AgricultureWithTables
CWCB
>
SWSI II Technical Roundtables
>
DayForward
>
Section3_AgricultureWithTables
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 10:29:51 AM
Creation date
1/10/2008 1:49:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI II Technical Roundtables
Title
SWSI Phase 2 Report - Alternative Agricultural Water Transfer Methods to Traditional Purchase and Transfer
Date
11/7/2007
Author
CWCB
SWSI II - Doc Type
Final Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 3 <br />Alternative Agricultural Water Transfer Methods to Traditional Purchase and Transfer <br />legal for the transferred "consumable" water to be <br />used and reused to extinction. <br />3.4.1 Dynamics Leading to <br />Agricultural Transfers <br />There are a number of factors contributing to the <br />practice of acquiring and permanently transferring <br />agricultural water rights to other uses by M~eI <br />interests. These factors include: <br />The complexity and uncertainty associated with <br />developing future water supplies makes the <br />purchase of existing water rights more attractive. <br />Permitting may be simpler for such transfers than <br />for the development of a new water supply <br />project, since the agricultural water to be <br />acquired has already been diverted from the <br />stream system and a portion consumed This can <br />result in a higher level of certainty than <br />construction of a new reservoir storing junior <br />water rights where environmental issues and the <br />effects of new depletions will be evaluated. <br />irrigated agriculture. <br />3.4.2 Economic and Social <br />Considerations of Agricultural <br />Transfers <br />Traditional agricultural water transfers resulting in <br />permanent dry-up, though widely practiced in <br />certain areas of the state as a water supply option for <br />M~eI users, have several potential issues and <br />conflicts. <br />Localized socio-economic impacts, such as <br />reduced property taxes to schools and local <br />governments and less revenue to local businesses <br />may result from the permanent dry-up of <br />agricultural lands unless the irrigated lands are <br />converted to other productive uses such as <br />residential, commercial, industrial, recreation, or <br />income producing non-irrigated agriculture. <br />Irrigation of agricultural lands has historically <br />resulted in the development of a local economy. In <br />addition to supporting the farmer or rancher, the <br />associated economic activity may form the basis <br />of the entire economy of the local community. <br />This impact may be greater for more rural <br />agricultural areas. Many of these areas are <br />struggling due to the low returns currently <br />realized by farmers. These impacts can be <br />minimized; however, through the use of the <br />formerly irrigated land by a combined use of <br />dryland cropping and upland small game <br />enterprises or fishing. <br />3-6 FINAL DRAFT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.