Laserfiche WebLink
Section 2 <br />Conservation and Efficiency Technical Roundtable <br />In addition the impacts of climate variability on <br />water conservation and system reliability have not <br />been addressed by this TRT. <br />The following conclusions and recommendations <br />are made by CWCB staff after a review of the <br />Water Conservation and Efficiency TRT efforts. <br />The primary areas where there is a lack of <br />consensus among TRT members is on the <br />successful implementation of some of the <br />conservation measures, especially turf replacement <br />and the role of water conservation in eliminating <br />the need for structural projects and processes that <br />water providers have planned to meet future water <br />demands. <br />Potential Impacts of Water Conservation <br />on Supply Reliability and Potential Uses of <br />Conserved Water <br />1. Issues related to conservation and reliability <br />are specific to each utility and dependent upon <br />the portfolio of water rights (type and <br />priority). <br />2. Water planners are strongly encouraged to <br />analyze safe yield and develop reliability <br />criteria for their systems. <br />Water providers should evaluate the actual <br />impacts of conservation on system yields and <br />reliability through model runs and reasonable <br />assumptions about technological and behavior <br />savings that may be expected from customers <br />during droughts before and after the <br />implementation of conservation measures. <br />4. The impacts of the implementation of water <br />conservation measures on the reliability of <br />water systems should be examined based on <br />the potential uses of the conserved water, such <br />as new growth, instream flows, drought <br />reserve, or lease or sale to other entities. <br />5. The use of a portion of conserved water for <br />new growth or drought reserve by the <br />conserving utility appears possible under most <br />circumstances without impacting reliability. <br />6. The use of a portion of conserved water for <br />environmental flows also is feasible, especially <br />if the water is subject to a pull back by the <br />utility during drought or other water <br />shortages. Some conserved water, such as from <br />in-basin direct flow rights, may have <br />limitations if transferred to an environmental <br />flow. <br />At this time, based on extensive utility <br />feedback, it is very unlikely that any utility <br />would permanently sell conserved water to <br />another utility. <br />8. When evaluating demand reduction, it appears <br />that some additional water savings can still be <br />FINAL DRAFT 2-23 <br />Example of Low Water Use (25% Bluegrass) <br />Residential Landscaping <br />WaterWise Landscaping Trees, Shrubs £t Vines <br />Jim Knoof. Chamisa Books <br />Example of Moderate Water Use (50% Bluegrass) <br />Residential Landscaping <br />WaterWise Landscaping Trees, Shrubs £t Vines <br />Jim Knoof. Chamisa Books <br />