My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Section1_Introduction
CWCB
>
SWSI II Technical Roundtables
>
DayForward
>
Section1_Introduction
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 10:29:49 AM
Creation date
1/10/2008 1:33:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI II Technical Roundtables
Title
SWSI Phase 2 Report - Section 1 Introduction
Date
11/7/2007
Author
CWCB
SWSI II - Doc Type
Final Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 1 <br />Introduction <br />It is this gap that must be filled with "new" water. If <br />water suppliers bad the water to meet the demand <br />represented by this gap, there would be no gap. <br />The mission for the state in filling this gap should be: <br />Foster cooperation among water suppliers and <br />citizens in every water basin to examine and <br />implement options to fill the gap between ongoing <br />water planning and future water needs. <br />The goals of this mission are to: <br />1. Foster cooperation among water suppliers and <br />citizens in every water basin. Because SWSI <br />was an initiative, the work must be carried <br />forward. The CWCB has continued the <br />discussions that began at the Basin Roundtable <br />(BRT) meetings about in-basin projects and <br />needs through the Interbasin Compact Process <br />BRTs. <br />2. Examine and implement options to fill the gap <br />between ongoing water planning and fLrture <br />water needs. SWSI did not produce a list of <br />specific projects to fill the 20 percent M~eI gap, <br />or provide for environmental and recreational <br />needs. SWSI did identify the options, both at the <br />conceptual and project specific level, that would <br />most likely be pursued to meet the gap between <br />supply and demand. The examination and <br />implementation of these options should be placed <br />in the context of goal number one. <br />3. Examine and implement options to fill the gap <br />associated with local agricultural shortages <br />and environmental and recreational <br />enhancements. As the state moves forward in <br />addressing statewide needs, it should look to <br />foster multipurpose projects that could also <br />satisfy M~eI, environmental, and recreational <br />needs. These multipurpose projects will enhance <br />project feasibility. In addition, opportunities for <br />nonpermanent agricultural transfers warrant <br />further consideration. <br />1.5 SWSI Key Findings <br />SWSI put forth a "picture" ofwhere Colorado may be <br />by the year 2030 and identified a number of <br />important issues and questions regarding how that <br />"picture" of Colorado fits with the values, objectives, <br />and future goals identified for Colorado. SWSI <br />articulated 10 major findings, which are summarized <br />below. <br />1. Significant increases in Colorado's population <br />together with agricultural water needs and an <br />increased focus on recreation and environmental <br />issues will intensify competition for water. By <br />2030, 2.8 million more people are expected to call <br />Colorado home. Water demands will increase by <br />53 percent during this time. <br />2. Projects and water management processes that <br />local M~eI providers are implementing or <br />planning to implement have the ability to meet <br />about 80 percent of Colorado's M~eI water needs <br />through 2030. <br />To the extent that these identified M~eI projects <br />are not successfully implemented, Colorado will <br />see a significantly greater reduction in irrigated <br />agricultural lands as M~eI water providers seek <br />additional permanent transfers of agricultural <br />water rights. <br />4. Supplies are not necessarily where demands are; <br />localized shortages exist, especially in headwater <br />areas, and compact entitlements in some basins <br />are not fully utilized. <br />5. Increased reliance onnon-renewable, non- <br />tributarygroundwater for permanent water <br />supply warrants serious reliability and <br />sustainability concerns in some areas, particularly <br />along the Front Range. <br />6. In-basin solutions can help resolve the remaining <br />20 percent gap between M~eI water supply and <br />demand, but there will be tradeoffs and impacts <br />on other users especially agriculture and the <br />environment. <br />FINAL DRAFT 1-5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.