Laserfiche WebLink
Contents <br />Tables <br />1-1 TRT Focus and Mission Statement .................................................................................. .....1-7 <br />2-1 Wbat are the Projected Potential Long-term Savings from Conservation <br /> Alternatives? ............................................................................................................................ ... 2-6 <br />2-2 Matrix of Conservation Impacts by Source and Right ................................................ ...2-13 <br />2 3 "How Much Do You Think Colorado Springs Utilities Should Spend to <br /> Promote Water Conservation?~~ .......................................................................................... . 2-14 <br />2-4 Implementation of Conservation Measures ..................................................................... ..2-15 <br />2-5 City of Westminster Growth Management Program- Implementation <br /> History .................................................................................................................................... ..2-16 <br />2-6 City ofWestminster -Water Conservation Rate Structure Implementation <br /> History .................................................................................................................................... ..2-17 <br />2-7 City ofWestminster -Water Tap Fee Implementation History .............................. .. 2-17 <br />2-8 City ofWestminster -Formal Water Conservation Program Implementation <br /> History .................................................................................................................................... ..2-18 <br />2-9 City ofWestminster -Water Conservation Landscape Regulations <br /> Implementation History ....................................................................................................... ..2-18 <br />2-10 List of Potential Coordinating Organizations for Conservation Public <br /> Information .............................................................................................................................. . 2-20 <br />2-11 Water Conservation and Efficiency TRT Membership ................................................ .2-29 <br />3-1 Breakdown of Potentia12030 Changes in Irrigated Acreage ..................................... .... 3-5 <br />3-2 Selected Crop Enterprise Budgets ...................................................................................... ... 3-8 <br />3-3 Alternative to Permanent Agriculture Dry-Up Applicability -Technical <br /> Subcommittee .......................................................................................................................... . 3-43 <br />3-4 Alternatives to Agriculture Dry-Up Implementability -Legal Subcommittee ..... .3-44 <br />3-5 Alternatives to Permanent Agricultural Dry-Up Financial Subcommittee ............ . 3-45 <br />3-6 Advantages and Disadvantages of a Traditional Agricultural Transfer Program <br /> as Compared with a Rotational Fallowing Program .................................................... . 3-29 <br />3-7 Benefits and Shortcomings of a Rotational Fallowing Program ................................ . 3-29 <br />3-8 An Evaluation of Interruptible Supply Agreements Compared with <br /> Traditional Agricultural Transfers .................................................................................... . 3-30 <br />3-9 An Evaluation of Water Banks Compared with Traditional Agricultural <br /> Transfers ................................................................................................................................... .. 3-31 <br />3-10 An Evaluation of Reduced Agricultural Consumptive Use through Efficiency <br /> or Cropping Compared with Traditional Agricultural Transfers ............................. . 3-32 <br />3-ll An Evaluation of Purchase-Leaseback Compared with Traditional <br /> Agricultural Transfers ........................................................................................................... . 3-32 <br />3-12 Typical Goals of Buyers and Sellers in an Agricultural Water Transfer <br /> Program .................................................................................................................................... . 3-33 <br />3-13 Distance, Elevation, and Total Dissolved Solids for Agricultural Transfer/ <br /> Rotational Fallowing Alternatives for Major Gap Areas ............................................. . 3-35 <br />3-14 Prioritize and Quantify Alternatives to Permanent Agricultural Dry-Up TRT <br /> Membership ............................................................................................................................. . 3-40 <br />/+~'~w DRAFT FINAL ix <br />