My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
S10_11-15-04
CWCB
>
SWSI
>
DayForward
>
S10_11-15-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2010 9:24:17 AM
Creation date
1/10/2008 11:35:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI
Basin
Statewide
Title
SWSI Phase 1 Report - Section 10 Basin-Specific Options
Date
11/15/2004
Author
CWCB
SWSI - Doc Type
Final Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 10 <br />Basin-Specific Options <br />10.1.8 Rio Grande Basin <br />10.1.8.1 Rio Grande Basin Gap Analysis Issues <br />As presented in Section 6, the gap analysis process <br />presented at the Basin Roundtable Technical Meetings <br />provided information on the Identified Projects and <br />Processes that M&I water providers are reasonably <br />confident of implementing to meet 2030 water demands. <br />Key activities related to water supply planning and basin <br />specific issues raised throughout the meetings and SWSI <br />process with respect to M&I and SSI demands in the Rio <br />Grande Basin include the following: <br />10.1.8.3 Rio Grande Basin Summary of <br />Conditional Storage Rights <br />To portray the conditional storage rights present in the <br />Rio Grande Basin, the area was described using water <br />districts as shown in Figure 10-20. <br />The eight water districts in the Rio Grande Basin can <br />also be described using the main stream systems, which <br />are shown in Table 10-16. <br />Table 10-16 Rio Grande Basin Water Districts and <br />Associated Stream Names <br />^ There are not any existing or projected SSI uses. <br />^ There is potential for additional M&I conservation and <br />some providers are starting to install water meters. <br />^ Groundwater is physically available for most <br />anticipated M&I growth. <br />^ Augmentation of all new wells is required. <br />Agricultural issues noted throughout SWSI in the Rio <br />Grande Basin include: <br />^ Agricultural use is at unsustainable levels of pumping <br />in the closed basin and water levels have dropped in <br />the unconfined aquifer and in parts of the confined <br />aquifer. <br />^ Up to 100,000 acres of agricultural land may need to <br />no longer be irrigated in order to return and maintain <br />groundwater at historical levels. <br />^ It will be a challenge to achieve voluntary reduction of <br />irrigated acres and offset the economic impacts of <br />reducing irrigated acreage. <br />^ There will be some minor potential loss of irrigated <br />acres as a result of dry-up and transfer of the <br />consumptive use for M&I augmentation. <br />10.1.8.2 Rio Grande Basin Supply Availability <br />Issues <br />In the Rio Grande Basin, the following issues were <br />identified regarding supply availability: <br />^ There is very limited availability of water for <br />development under the Rio Grande Compact. <br />Sections 4 and 7 describe the compact and supply <br />availability. <br />^ RICDs and CWCB instream flow water rights may <br />impact the ability to manage water supplies upstream <br />of these water rights. <br />~ <br />$~ole'ri~ice Wo~e' $upplY Initia~ive <br />20 Rio Grande River <br />21 Alamosa River <br />22 Conejos River <br />24 Culebra Creek <br />25 San Luis Creek <br />26 Saguache Creek <br />27 Camero/ La Grita Creek <br />35 Trinchera Creek <br />As shown in Table 10-17, four water districts in the Rio <br />Grande Basin contain a total of 134,105 AF of conditional <br />storage rights, which exceeds the amount that can be <br />developed given compact limitations. Approximately <br />8,600 AF of these rights have priority dates of 1900 to <br />1920. The remaining have priority dates that begin in <br />1960 and that extend to present day. The numbers <br />presented in this table describe the total volume of <br />conditional rights by priority time period and not the <br />number of individually decreed conditional rights. These <br />priority time periods are based on adjudication dates and <br />used solely for the purpose of aggregating the numerous <br />conditional rights into a table for presentation. The <br />number, rather than volume, of conditional rights is <br />presented in Appendix H. <br />Water District 20 in the Rio Grande Basin has the largest <br />volume of conditional storage rights. This is depicted in <br />Table 10-17 and also presented graphically in <br />Appendix H. There is approximately 120,000 AF of <br />conditional storage rights in this water district with priority <br />dates beginning in 1900. Figure 10-21 focuses on the <br />priority date of the conditional storage rights. The largest <br />portion of storage rights have priority dates of between <br />1960 and 1980, followed by the 1980 to 2002 time <br />period. <br />~~ <br />S:\REPORT\WORD PROCESSING\REPORT\S10 11-11-04.DOC 10-35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.