My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
S8_11-15-04
CWCB
>
SWSI
>
DayForward
>
S8_11-15-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2010 9:24:17 AM
Creation date
1/10/2008 11:21:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI
Basin
Statewide
Title
SWSI Phase 1 Report - Section 8 Options for Meeting Future Water Needs
Date
11/15/2004
Author
CWCB
SWSI - Doc Type
Final Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
S~Ct1011 8 <br />Options for Meeting Future Water Needs <br />~~7r~~ <br />Statewide Water Supply Initiafive <br />8.1 Developing Options for Future <br />Water Needs <br />This section outlines the broad strategies that can be <br />used to address Colorado's water supply needs. These <br />strategies are comprises of different methods or "options" <br />that can be implemented independently or in combination <br />with other options. When several options are combined, <br />the resulting portfolio of options is termed a water supply <br />alternative. A group of individual options that are similar <br />in nature can also be combined into "families of options" <br />as described in the next subsection. Implementation of <br />the Identified Projects and Processes is critical to <br />meeting Colorado's future water demands. Unless these <br />projects and plans move forward, significant additional <br />water supplies, in addition to the remaining gaps <br />projected in Section 6, will be required. <br />As discussed in Section 6, through the Basin Roundtable <br />process it was determined that approximately 80 percent <br />of Colorado's future water supply needs can be <br />addressed via projects and processes that are being <br />pursued by local water providers. Water supply options <br />that could be used to address the remaining 20 percent <br />and the uncertainty associated with the Identified <br />Projects and Processes were developed during the Basin <br />Roundtable process. This section discusses these <br />options and their pros and cons. <br />8.2 Families of Options <br />The Identified Projects and Processes listed in Section 6 <br />and additional future options generally fall under one of <br />the following categories, or "families" of options: <br />^ Water Conservation, including: <br />- Active M&I Conservation <br />- Agricultural Efficiency Measures <br />^ Agricultural Transfers, including: <br />- Permanent Agricultural Transfer <br />- Interruptible Agricultural Transfer <br />- Rotating Agricultural Transfer Fallowing with Firm <br />Yield for Agriculture <br />^ Development of Additional Storage, including: <br />- Development of New Storage Facilities <br />- Enlargement of Existing Storage Facilities <br />^ Conjunctive Use of Surface Water and Groundwater, <br />including: <br />- Bedrock Aquifers <br />- Alluvial Aquifers <br />^ M&I Reuse, including: <br />- Water Rights Exchanges <br />- Non-potable Reuse <br />- Indirect Potable Reuse <br />^ Control of Non-Native Phreatophytes <br />The options included under these categories can be <br />evaluated individually or in combination to help meet the <br />remaining water supply needs for each basin. The <br />likelihood that these options will be successfully <br />implemented and sustainable depends, in part, on the <br />public and institutional support. That support is to a large <br />extent dependent on how well each option meets the <br />SWSI water management objectives. Thus, the above <br />options were evaluated in terms of their performance <br />according to the management objectives and grouped <br />into alternatives. <br />A brief description of water use in Colorado can help put <br />in context the limitations of some of these alternatives <br />that would produce additional water supplies through <br />increasing the efficiency of water uses. More detail <br />regarding basic provisions of Colorado water law can be <br />found in Section 4. At the start of the SWSI Basin <br />Roundtable process, the overriding objective of <br />compliance with the Colorado water rights system and <br />interstate compacts provided the framework for <br />evaluating potential strategies for meeting future water <br />needs. A primary tenet of Colorado water law applicable <br />to water rights change of use is that return flows resulting <br />from beneficial use of water under an appropriation are <br />"owed" to the stream, where they provide water for <br />subsequent appropriators. This tenet derives from the <br />fact that typically not all the water diverted from the <br />stream is 100 percent consumed. For example, when <br />irrigating crops, water may seep into the ground as it is <br />conveyed through the irrigation canal or infiltrate into the <br />ground once it is applied to the field. Much of this <br />~~ <br />a4~E~t t ~>~~.5~?'I <br />,o ~ -,~ <br />~ <br />S:\REPORT\WORD PROCESSING\REPORT\S8 11-9-04.DOC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.