Laserfiche WebLink
Section 7 <br />Availability of Existing Water Supplies <br />ended, the DSS dataset for the Colorado should be <br />extended, including updated irrigated acres and M&I <br />demands. A new StateMod model run should be <br />conducted with the updated dataset to determine if the <br />recent drought is a new critical period. <br />Maintaining or enhancing recreational and environmental <br />flows could also affect future supply availability. <br />Environmental and recreational considerations are <br />further developed in Sections 6 and 10 of this report. For <br />example, a number of endangered fish species, such as <br />the Razorback Sucker and the Humpback Chub, are <br />present in the Colorado River and tributaries, and require <br />special attention. The Colorado River immediately <br />upstream from the confluence with the Gunnison River <br />(15-mile reach) is currently operating under a PBO that <br />may affect the amount of allowable depletions in this <br />upper subbasin to help promote the recovery of four <br />endangered fish species. Coordinated reservoir <br />operations, habitat improvement, stocking, and control of <br />non-native species are other options that can help meet <br />the needs of endangered species. <br />Water is available for future demands out of contract <br />pools in Green Mountain, Ruedi, and Wolford Mountain <br />Reservoirs. There is approximately 10,000 AFY available <br />from Green Mountain, 21,000 AF from Ruedi, and <br />7,500 AF from Wolford Mountain Reservoirs. Existing <br />and future supply availability out of Green Mountain <br />Reservoir may be affected by minimum storage <br />restrictions recently placed on the reservoir. Historic <br />movement of landslides in the adjacent Town of Heeney <br />are a concern during low water storage levels such as <br />occurred during the recent drought period and caused <br />storage restrictions. If it is determined that the reservoir <br />must maintain these minimum storage levels long term, <br />and storage is not replaced elsewhere, there may be a <br />permanent loss of firm yield for the users of Green <br />Mountain Reservoir. <br />Finally, in addition to future in-basin demands, there will <br />likely be additional diversions through existing transbasin <br />facilities (such as Denver Water's Roberts and Moffat <br />Tunnels and NCWCD's CBT and Windy Gap firming <br />projects) as these transbasin diverters grow into their <br />Colorado Basin water rights and firm existing water rights <br />with east slope storage. These increased transbasin <br />diversions are not included in the present DSS analysis, <br />but will affect future supply availability in the Colorado <br />Basin. SWSI recognizes the need to evaluate future <br />~~ ~ <br />available supply in the headwaters of the Colorado <br />Basin. This will be evaluated in more detail as part of <br />SWSI's ongoing work in 2005 to 2006. The Denver Water <br />Northern Firming and the NCWCD's Windy Gap Firming <br />Projects, if implemented, could increase average annual <br />diversions from the Colorado to the South Platte by up to <br />48,000 AFY. The proposed Homestake II or Wolcott <br />Reservoir Projects could also potentially increase <br />transbasin diversions. Historical transbasin diversions <br />from the Colorado Basin are shown in Figure 7-32. <br />Transbasin diversions averaged 482,728 AFY from 1971 <br />to 2003. The locations of transbasin diversions from the <br />Colorado, Gunnison, and Dolores/San Juan/San Miguel <br />Basins are shown in Figure 7-33. <br />7.3.2.2 Colorado Basin Alluvial Aquifer <br />The distribution of alluvial deposits in the Colorado Basin <br />varies greatly from one reach to the next. The alluvial <br />deposits, as mapped by USGS geologic quadrangle <br />maps, are primarily located near the Towns of Eagle and <br />Gypsum, along the Roaring Fork River, Roan Creek, and <br />from the Town of Palisade to the Colorado-Utah state <br />line. Alluvium is very limited or non-existent in the canyon <br />sections of the Colorado River where the bedrock is <br />exposed (CGS 2003). <br />The saturated thickness of the alluvium in the basin is <br />represented by the interval from the water table to the <br />underlying bedrock. Welder (1987) reported that test <br />holes in the alluvium of Roan and Parachute Creeks <br />penetrated 80 feet and 70 feet, respectively, of saturated <br />permeable sand and gravel. For the Fraser River, <br />Apodaca and Bails (1999) report alluvial saturated <br />thickness ranging from 14 to 45 feet, averaging 21 feet in <br />the spring, and ranging from 7 to 20 feet in the fall with <br />an average of 15 feet. <br />The alluvial groundwater in the Colorado Basin is <br />considered tributary to the Colorado River and users of <br />this resource are administered under the Prior <br />Appropriation System. Except for domestic or other low- <br />volume exempt uses, the use of groundwater in this <br />aquifer requires a water court-approved augmentation <br />plan that describes how depletions to the river will be <br />offset to avoid injury to senior appropriators and to <br />comply with the interstate compact. <br />The location and extent of alluvial aquifer in the Colorado <br />River Basin is shown in Figure 3-13. <br />~~ <br />Statew~itle Water Supply Inii'iative <br />7-22 S:\REPORT\WORD PROCESSING\REPORT\S7 11-10.04.DOC <br />