Laserfiche WebLink
Section 7 <br />Availability of Existing Water Supplies <br />7.1 Methods and Tools Employed <br />to Evaluate Surface Water <br />Supply Availability <br />The availability of surface water and groundwater <br />supplies for each basin are summarized in this section. <br />Physical availability of surface and groundwater <br />resources must be carefully evaluated against the legal <br />right to divert, pump, or consume these resources. <br />Surface water supply availability was estimated at <br />selected points in each major river basin in Colorado. <br />Colorado's DSS surface water allocation model, <br />StateMod, and supporting datasets were the primary <br />tools used for this analysis when available. StateMod <br />simulates daily or monthly hydrologic water availability in <br />a river basin based on a stream's water rights, structures, <br />and operating rules (http://cdss.state.co.us). For those <br />basins without StateMod datasets, alternative sources <br />and studies were used to summarize available water to <br />the extent possible. <br />7.1.1 Decision Support Systems <br />StateMod simulates three types of flow: physically <br />available, legally available, and naturalized. These terms <br />are described below. The primary data sources used in <br />the development of the StateMod input files include <br />USGS and DWR streamflow measurements, SEO <br />diversion records, reservoir storage records, basin <br />studies and reports, and interviews with water <br />administrators and project owners. Much of the model <br />input data is stored in HydroBase, the DSS central <br />database. HydroBase contains historical water rights, <br />stream gage locations, and real-time and historical <br />stream flows. <br />^ Ph~~ic~ll~ Avail~bl~ p~/~ter: The actual or observed <br />amount of water flowing in the stream. This flow is <br />measured at a gage or calculated as a function of <br />historical hydrology less current water uses, and the <br />effects of storage and conveyance structures. Existing <br />storage and conveyance capacities are used. <br />^ L~gally Av~ilabl~ UVat~r: The portion of physically <br />available flow that is unappropriated, or water that <br />could be developed without injury to other water rights <br />or compacts. The water must be first physically <br />~~7r~~ <br />Statewide Water Supply Initiafive <br />available, and then the legal restrictions to that water <br />must be assessed (e.g., downstream calls, compact <br />requirements, etc.). As with physically available flow, <br />this calculated flow is a function of historical <br />hydrology combined with current water use, etc. <br />Water that is legally available can serve multiple <br />purposes. For example, water that must be delivered <br />to a downstream senior right or compact requirement <br />could provide environmental benefits. <br />^ Natural9z~d Str~~~fl~v~: The undepleted, <br />unregulated total water supply that would have been <br />available absent all human intervention (e.g., <br />diversions, storage and releases, return flows, CU). <br />This calculated flow is the primary input dataset used <br />for making physically and legally available flow <br />simulations in StateMod and is often referred to as <br />"base case." Naturalized flow is also known as <br />natural, native, or virgin flow. <br />StateMod runs consist of baseline datasets that were <br />used to describe water availability in this section. <br />Irrigation demands that have been included in the DSS <br />baseline runs described in the individual river basins <br />reflect 1993 irrigated acreage and crop types for the <br />Western Slope basins, and 1998 irrigated acreage and <br />crop types in the Rio Grande Basin. "Current" M&I <br />demands for all DSS models, except the Rio Grande <br />Basin, reflect 1996 levels of use, corresponding to the <br />end-date of the current model study period. In the Rio <br />Grande Basin, the M&I demand reflects 1998 levels of <br />use. During the SWSI process, M&I demands for 2000 <br />and 2030 were developed that can be incorporated into <br />future analyses. While it is important to update M&I <br />demands for the DSS basins, the incorporation of 2000 <br />water demands will not significantly affect the supply <br />availability shown in this section. Section 7.4 includes <br />estimates of 2000 and 2030 depletions and supply that <br />can be developed under the Colorado River Compact. <br />Additional information on the DSS models can be found <br />at: http://cdss.state.co.us/ . <br />7.1.2 Data Sources <br />Table 7-1 summarizes the sources of supply data used in <br />this study to evaluate surface water supply availability. <br />The Colorado, Gunnison, Yampa, White, Rio Grande, <br />San Juan, and Dolores Basins have existing DSS <br />datasets and models. StateMod was therefore used for <br />~~ <br />a4~E~t t ~>~~.5~?'I <br />,o ~ -,~ <br />«~~~~~~,~,,, <br />r•-'- <br />~ <br />~,~~~~~t~~~~s~~~~~ ~,~ <br />NATUIZAI. <br />~~~~~~~~z~ ~s <br />S:\REPORT\WORD PROCESSING\REPORT\S7 11-10.04.DOC <br />