Section 4
<br />Legal Framework for Water Use
<br />municipal/industrial users to rotate or fallow crops in
<br />certain years, thereby freeing up water supplies for
<br />municipal/industrial uses during such years. The terms of
<br />any such interruptible supply agreements would vary on
<br />a case-by-case basis, but could potentially allow for
<br />continued agricultural use in some, but not all, years. In
<br />order to be effective, such agreements need to be
<br />sufficiently long-term and reliable for municipal/industrial
<br />users to allow the sale of municipal taps on such basis.
<br />Moreover, any such arrangement would necessarily
<br />require protections to ensure that no expansion of use
<br />could occur to the detriment of junior water rights
<br />holders.
<br />4.3.5 Augmentation Plans
<br />An augmentation plan allows a water user to divert water
<br />out-of-priority from its decreed point of diversion, so long
<br />as replacement water is provided to the stream from
<br />another source, to make up for any deficit to other water
<br />users.43 An augmentation plan, like a change of water
<br />right, must be approved by the water court and is also
<br />subject to the "no injury rule." Accordingly, the 1969 Act
<br />requires substituted water to be "of a quality and quantity
<br />to meet the requirements for which the water of the
<br />senior appropriator has normally been used[.]~~44
<br />As explained by the Colorado Supreme Court in In re
<br />Application of Midway Ranches v. Midway Ranches
<br />Property Owners Association, Inc., 45 "[a]ugmentation
<br />plans implement the Colorado doctrine of optimum use
<br />and priority administration, which favors management of
<br />Colorado's water resource to extend its benefit for
<br />multiple beneficial purposes." Augmentation plans
<br />provide a statutory mechanism for many different types
<br />of water users, big and small, to obtain water when and
<br />where they need it, by using other sources of water to
<br />replace or "augment" the out of priority depletions that
<br />result from their water use. In times of scarcity, an
<br />augmentation plan allows a water user to continue
<br />diverting even under a relativelyjunior priority, so long as
<br />it can provide replacement water to satisfy the needs of
<br />downstream seniors. As noted above, however, under an
<br />augmentation plan, a water user is essentially replacing
<br />the amount of water consumed with a different source of
<br />water. The water user gets credit for the amount of water
<br />it diverts that returns to the stream unconsumed. As a
<br />43 CR5. § 37-92-305(5).
<br />~ Id.
<br />45 938 P.2d 515,522 (Cob. 1997).
<br />C~A
<br />result, increased efficiency of use under an augmentation
<br />plan potentially reduces the amount of credit a water
<br />user receives for water returned to the stream
<br />unconsumed.
<br />4.3.6 Instream Flows
<br />Under the 1969 Act, the CWCB is authorized to
<br />appropriate water for "minimum stream flows or for
<br />natural surface water levels or volumes for natural lakes
<br />to preserve the natural environment to a reasonable
<br />degree."46 Appropriations for instream flows may only be
<br />made by the CWCB, not by private individuals (however,
<br />it is noted that a few private instream flows were
<br />obtained in the early 1970s upon initial passage of the
<br />statute, but this is no longer allowed under the law), and
<br />must be made within the priority system, consistent with
<br />the restrictions in Sections 5 and 6 of Colorado's
<br />Constitution. The CWCB can also acquire water rights for
<br />instream flows "by grant purchase, donation, bequest,
<br />devise, lease, exchange, or other contractual
<br />agreement." 47
<br />In recent years, Colorado's legislature has expanded the
<br />resources available to the CWCB to protect instream
<br />flows. In 2002, the legislature increased the sources of
<br />funding that the CWCB may use to acquire water for
<br />instream flows, to include "any funds available to it, other
<br />than the construction fund created in section 37-60-121,
<br />for acquisition of water rights and their conversion to
<br />instream flow rights.48 In 2003, the legislature amended
<br />§ 37-83-105, C.R.S., which provides for temporary loans
<br />or exchanges of water between water users in times of
<br />drought without requiring adjudication of a change of
<br />water rights, to allow the CWCB to receive loaned water
<br />for instream flow purposes on a temporary basis, not to
<br />exceed 120 days, in any basin where the Governor has
<br />declared a drought or other emergency.49 Such loans are
<br />subject to a determination by the State Engineer that
<br />other water users will not be injured.
<br />It is essential that the state be able to acquire water
<br />rights for instream flow purposes in order to protect
<br />wildlife and the environment in a prior appropriation state
<br />during times of drought. Since Colorado water law does
<br />not allow the state to consider environmental factors in
<br />46 CR5. § 37-92-102(3).
<br />4~ Id.
<br />48 See id
<br />49 House Bill 03-1320.
<br />~~
<br />Sfvtewide Woter Supoly Initiofive
<br />4-H S:\REPORT\WORD PROCESSING\REPORT\S4 11-7-04.DOC
<br />
|