My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Exec Summary Report_11-15-04
CWCB
>
SWSI
>
DayForward
>
Exec Summary Report_11-15-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2010 9:24:17 AM
Creation date
1/10/2008 9:48:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI
Basin
Statewide
Title
SWSI Phase 1 Report - Executive Summary
Date
11/15/2004
Author
CWCB
SWSI - Doc Type
Final Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Executive Summary <br />To illustrate the possible impacts of the uncertainty of the <br />successful implementation of Identified Projects and <br />Processes, Figure ES-10 shows the total acres of <br />irrigated farm land that could be removed from irrigated <br />production if 25 to 50 percent of the Identified Projects <br />and Processes were not successfully implemented, and <br />the resulting gap in supply were met by agricultural <br />transfers. It is important to note that agricultural transfers <br />will require storage to firm the water supply for municipal <br />and industrial uses. <br />N 300,000 <br />`w <br />o~ <br />~ <br />0 ~ 250,000 <br />c Q <br />w <br />~ ~ zoo,ooo <br />v <br />v~ <br />Q N <br />-a ~ 150,000 <br />r c~ <br />~v <br />~~ <br />~ W 100,000 <br />ow <br />v ~~ <br />~o <br />E '~ 50,000 <br />~, <br />z -~ <br />0 <br />a .. <br />25% 50% <br />Uncertainty in Identified Projects & Processes <br />Figure ES-10 <br />Potential Impact on Irrigated Agricultural Acres if <br />Identified Projects & Processes are Not Implemented <br />In addition, the negative consequences that result from <br />agricultural land dry-up are not fully understood and <br />documented. Understanding the tradeoffs between <br />transferring an existing agricultural water use versus <br />developing new storage of unappropriated water is <br />essential to making wise water resource management <br />decisions. SWSI will examine this issue in more detail <br />during the next phase of work (2005). <br />It is also important to point out that in many agricultural <br />communities, the owners of water rights often wish to <br />retain their ability to sell or lease their water. This can <br />and has been a divisive issue in some of our basins. In <br />Colorado, water rights are property rights and farmers <br />and ranchers must retain their ability to sell or transfer <br />their water under a free market system. This tenet is vital <br />to retain the economic value of the water and is an <br />important option to M&I providers as they strive to meet <br />their future needs. <br />~ <br />$~ole'ri~ice Wo~e' $upplY Initia~ive <br />4. Supplies are Not Necessarily where Demands <br />Are; Localized Shortages Exist; Compact <br />Entitlements are Not Fully Utilized. <br />All basins except for the North Platte and Yampa/White/ <br />Green have identified future gaps in meeting 2030 M&I <br />water demands that are not addressed by the Identified <br />Projects and Processes. Basins that have developable <br />supplies may still show gaps due to the geographic <br />location of demand in relation to the available supplies. <br />Developable supplies are defined as water supplies that <br />can be developed with new water projects or water rights <br />and require both the physical and legal availability of the <br />water supplies. <br />Localized M&I shortages are projected in most basins. <br />Many headwaters areas will see significant percentage <br />increases in M&I needs and these areas will also be <br />seeking to address recreational and environmental uses. <br />Some of these headwater areas will have limitations on <br />future water development due to lack of available flows <br />both on average and during drought (seasonal or dry <br />year limitations due to lack of physical availability) or <br />downstream senior water rights demands. The existence <br />of senior water rights will require the replacement of new <br />junior consumptive uses (augmentation of depletions) to <br />downstream senior agricultural and municipal diversions, <br />CWCB instream flow rights, and recreational in-channel <br />diversion water rights. Some of the mountain headwater <br />areas, such as Gunnison County in the Gunnison Basin <br />and Grand and Summit Counties in the Colorado Basin <br />are projected to have gaps in meeting demands, even <br />though these basins have supplies that can be <br />developed by future water projects because supplies are <br />not at the location of demand. Other headwater areas, <br />such as Chaffee County in the Arkansas Basin, have <br />gaps and there are no additional supplies to develop. <br />Meeting future water demands in Chaffee County will <br />require the use of existing supplies or the transfer of <br />water from other uses such as agriculture. <br />In the Dolores/San Juan/San Miguel Basin, much of the <br />growth in M&I needs will likely occur in areas or tributary <br />basins between some of the larger surface water <br />supplies. The areas between Pagosa Springs and <br />Durango, the La Plata Basin, the upper portion of the <br />San Miguel Basin, and some areas near Cortez will need <br />additional infrastructure to store and transport water to <br />the demand locations. <br />~~ <br />S:\REPORT\WORD PROCESSING\REPORT\EXEC SUMMARY 11-10-04.DOC ES-19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.