Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CONI <br /> <br />Methodologies for Estimating and Projecting Urban (Municipal & Industrial) and <br />Agricultural Demands and Environmental and Recreational Flow Requirements <br />November 2003 <br /> <br />For the purposes of SWSI any additional environmental and recreational flows greater <br />than decreed instream flows or recreational in-channel diversions and other <br />agreements for flows may be evaluated as part of specific future water supply <br />alternatives and evaluated under the same process and objectives as other future <br />water supply alternatives to see how they perform in meeting the established <br />objectives. Furthermore, it is anticipated that any potential impacts on environmental <br />and recreational flows will likely have to be quantified and addressed under the <br />requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and regulatory <br />permitting processes on a project-by-project basis. Environmental and recreational <br />flow needs will be considered during the SWSI process when evaluating new water <br />diversions or storage projects upstream or within the affected stream reaches. <br /> <br />In addition to the Colorado Instream Flow and the RICD Programs there are a <br />number of other activities that result in water being left in-channel for environmental <br />and recreational benefits. These include: interstate compact limitations or obligations; <br />claimed reserved water rights by the federal government for National Forests and <br />National Parks; certain mitigation measures required as permit conditions for <br />reservoirs or water diversion structures; and other mitigation measures that result <br />from addressing concerns of threatened and endangered species under the <br />Endangered Species Act. <br /> <br />Interstate Compacts and Equitable Apportionment Decrees: Interstate compacts or <br />equitable apportionment decrees exist for every major river basin in Colorado, and on <br />several minor streams as well. These compacts and decrees divide the water in those <br />basins and streams between Colorado and the downstream states. Thus, Colorado <br />does not have the legal right to totally deplete the waters of any major river basin in <br />the state beyond that provided by these compacts or decrees. Therefore, these <br />agreements provide a certain measure of environmental and recreational protection. <br /> <br />Federal Reserved Water Rights of the U.S. Forest Service: A brief summary of Federal <br />Reserved Water Rights is noted below: <br /> <br />. Water Division 1 - South Platte Basin: All instream flow claims were settled in <br />litigation. <br /> <br />. Water Division 2 - Arkansas Basin: All instream flow claims were withdrawn with <br />prejudice. <br /> <br />. Water Division 3 - Rio Grande Basin: All instream flow claims have been <br />adjudicated and incorporated in to the water right priority system. <br /> <br />. Water Divisions 4,5 and 6 - Gunnison, Colorado Mainstem, White and Yampa: No <br />reserved water right claims were pursued by the USFS and the time to make such <br />claims has expired. A cooperative effort to examine flow issues is currently <br />underway with the CWCB. <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />S:\TASK 8 & 9 SUPPLY AND DEMAND\SWSI DEMAND METHODOLOGY 11-26-03.DOC <br />