My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ArkansasComments24
CWCB
>
SWSI
>
DayForward
>
ArkansasComments24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 10:31:51 AM
Creation date
1/8/2008 12:25:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI
Basin
Arkansas
Title
Comments 24
Date
2/2/2004
SWSI - Doc Type
Comments
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />"' <br /> <br />02/02/2004 17:23 <br /> <br />7194813452 <br /> <br />PAGE 04 <br /> <br />· Union Park's pumped-storage and multi~basin delivery facilities can be permitted <br />and constructed in four self-funding phases over a 7 t015 year period, for a total cost <br />of about $3 billion; . <br /> <br />· Union Park's Phase I Dam, Taylor-Union pump/generator facility, and Union-Antero <br />Siphon to Denver and Colorado Springs would cost about $1.5 billion. Colorado <br />Springs and EI, Paso County would eventually need another gravity pipeline through <br />South Park to Rampart Reservoir above the Air Force Academy; <br /> <br />· Union Park's Phase 2 pumped-storage filling and peaking power operation between <br />Blue Mesa and Union Park Reservoirs would cost about $900 million, including <br />several small fishing and irrigation reservoirs for local Gunnison needs; <br /> <br />· Union Park's optional Phase 3 reversible interconnect pipeline between Union Park <br />Reservoir and Fry-Ark's southern collection system could further enhance <br />efficiencies of existing reservoirs throughout four river basins for about $250 million; <br /> <br />· Union Park's optional Phase 4 pipeline branch from the Union-Antero high pressure <br />siphon can augment the Rio Grande Basin over Poncha Pass, when needed, for <br />droughts and endangered species needs, for about $250 million; <br /> <br />· Union Park's high storage. concept can substantially reduce regional evaporation <br />losses, Le. 1 ~ feet annually from surface of Union Park vs. 7 feet from Lake Powell; <br /> <br />· Union Park's expected 10 to 1 benefjt~cost ratio for enhancement of water rights and <br />utilities throughout five major river systems is about 500% more efficient than any <br />other current or proposed Western water storage project; <br /> <br />· Union Park can quickly solve regional water quality, endangered species, farm dry- <br />up, Front Range growth. Black Canyon, Kansas shortages, etc., without additional <br />dewatering of Colorado's excessively depleted South Platte, Arkansas, and <br />Colorado Main Stem Rivers, as well as regional ground water reserves; <br /> <br />· Union Park can be owned and managed by cooperating Western and Eastern Slope <br />water providers; or a Statewide Water Authority; Of' a Regional Water Authority; <br /> <br />· Union Park's unique high altitude, multi-basin, pumped-storage water and power <br />enhancement concept can serve as a watershed pilot program to solve the West's <br />escalating clean water and power crisis for future droughts and growth. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.