My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00284
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00284
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:32:39 PM
Creation date
1/8/2008 12:16:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Applicant
Thompson, J.R., G.W. Wilderson, and D.A. Griffith, North American Weather Consultants
Sponsor Name
USBR
Title
Cloud Seeding Data Collection, and Analysis Assoc. with the Colo River Augmentation Demonstration Program
Prepared For
USBR, Divison of Atmospheric Research
Prepared By
Thompson, Wilderson, Griffith
Date
12/1/1987
State
AZ
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Scientific Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The Grand Mesa study also eliminated the very light prec~p~- <br />tation periods from the data base. In doing so, it was found <br />that 11 percent of the total precipitation fell at a rate <br />of less than 0.01 inch per hour (compared to 5.5 percent in <br />Arizona). Elimination of these very light rates in Colorado <br />amounted to 56 percent of the total hours (compared to 32 <br />percent in the Arizona data-set) suggesting that even more <br />hours with light precipitation rates are common in Colorado. <br /> <br />3.2.5 <br /> <br />Dailv Precipitation Distribution <br /> <br />The cumulative frequencies for daily precipitation totals <br />are shown in Figure 3.2 Precipitation of 0.01 inch or more <br />was measured on 170 gauge-days. This represented about 36 <br />percent of all the days in the total storm periods. The figure <br />shows that half of the 170 days had amounts below 0.15 inch <br />and contributed less than 10 percent of the total precipi- <br />tation (54.0 inches). The similar analysis for the Grand <br />Mesa found the exact same results. In Arizona, half the total <br />precipitation fell on only 10 percent of the days (which had <br />totals of 0.70 inches or more). In Colorado, the corresponding <br />figures were that half the total precipitation fell on 14 <br />percent of the days (which had totals of 0.60 inches or more). <br />Furthermore, in Arizona there were 9 days (5 percent) with <br />totals greater than 0.99 inch (largest amount was 3.49 inch) <br />which contributed about one-third of the total precipitation. <br />The comparable numbers from Colorado were 6 days (3 percent) <br />with totals greater than 0.99 inch (largest amount was 2.03 <br />inch) which contributed one-fifth of the total accumulation. <br />Super et ale (1986) concluded there was obviously a limited <br />number of large storms on the Grand Mesa which were very important <br />to the total precipitation while the very frequent days with <br /> <br />3-35 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.