My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00284
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00284
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:32:39 PM
Creation date
1/8/2008 12:16:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Applicant
Thompson, J.R., G.W. Wilderson, and D.A. Griffith, North American Weather Consultants
Sponsor Name
USBR
Title
Cloud Seeding Data Collection, and Analysis Assoc. with the Colo River Augmentation Demonstration Program
Prepared For
USBR, Divison of Atmospheric Research
Prepared By
Thompson, Wilderson, Griffith
Date
12/1/1987
State
AZ
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Scientific Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3.2.4 <br /> <br />Precipitation Intensity Within storms <br /> <br />The distribution of precipitation intensity during the <br />storm periods was examined for each of the seven gauge sites <br />during the 11 storm periods. Because of the uncertainty of <br />whether all of the indicated precipitation was real in the <br />cases where very light precipitation was indicated, only the <br />hours where 0.01 inch or more was recorded were used in the <br />data-set. This should largely eliminate false observations <br />caused by temperature variations affecting the gauge mechanism, <br />the gauge still responding to precipitation from the previous <br />hour because of hysteresis, etc. This amounted to only a <br />5.5 percent reduction in precipitation from that shown in <br />Table 3-4, but it represented 468 hours, or 32 percent of <br />all the hours that precipitation was recorded during the storm <br />periods. Assuming most of these hours with rates less than <br />0.01 inch represented real precipitation, it is apparent that <br />many hours of very light precipitation did occur over the <br />watershed during the winter storms. On the average, these <br />very light rates occurred at each gauge site for about 67 <br />hours (6 hours per storm) during the field season. If, on <br />the average, a storm lasted one day, the suggestion is that <br />about one-quarter of the storm period had these very light <br />precipitation rates. <br /> <br />Figure 3.1 presents a plot of both the cumulative frequency <br />of occurrence and total precipitation at increments of 0.01 <br />inch. This analysis and some others presented subsequently <br />was patterned after that done by Super et ale (1986), so that <br />comparisons could be made with their work done on the Grand <br />Mesa of western Colorado. Their study used a two winter 10 <br />month period (November-March, inclusive) to develop precipi- <br /> <br />3-32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.