My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ArkansasComments11
CWCB
>
SWSI
>
DayForward
>
ArkansasComments11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 10:31:49 AM
Creation date
1/8/2008 11:28:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI
Basin
Arkansas
Title
Comments 11
Date
11/3/2003
SWSI - Doc Type
Comments
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Comments to SWSI, November 3, 2003, by John Wiener <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />AWRA. The Journal of the American Water Resources Association has also published <br />considerable scholarship, but listing all the sources by journals would take a long time. The <br />"heated debate" as one book title (arguing it's all wrong, I think; don't know) has it, goes on.. <br /> <br />Reports on Colorado places and sectors <br /> <br />There is a very good and pleasantly accessible report from Dr. Dennis Ojima and Dr. Jill Lackett, <br />and their colleagues and a large group of farmers and ranchers which provides the "best <br />available" wrap-up for the Plains at the moment. It's called: <br /> <br />Ojima, Dennis, S. and Jill M. Lackett, Compilers, and others, July 2002: Preparing for a <br />Chancinc Climate: The Potential Consequences of Climate Variabilitv and Chanae -- Report of <br />the Central Great Plains Reaional Assessment Group, for the US Global Change Research <br />Program. Fort Collins -" Colorado State University. The report is available at <br /> <br />http://www.nrel.colostate.edu/projects/gpa/gpa_report.pdf <br /> <br />Prospects for agriculture in the Plains are problematic, because of the difficulties for many <br />common activities and how they compare to national production. In short, things are not likely to <br />improve for marginal farming even if regional yields are not hurt but the national production is <br />increased, because the price squeeze is unlikely to be relieved, and may be worsened. If <br />regional yields are decreased, so much the worse. One interesting result is that irrigated <br />agriculture may not be helped even if climate favors farming, since the dryland growers would be <br />comparatively much better off without the costs of production that irrigation involved. <br /> <br />There is a new assessment for the Rocky Mountains and Great Basin region. which may be <br />useful for the West Slope interests in agriculture and range management; this one was based at <br />Utah State University. It is Wagner, F.H., Ed., 2003, Rockv Mountain - Great Basin Reaional <br />Climate Chance Assessment. Report for the US Global Change Research Program, Logan, UT: <br />Utah State University, available at: <br />http://www.cnr. usu .edu/default.asp?category=publications§ion=publications&content=climate <br /> <br />Unhappily, the current conditions include strong prospects for continuing decline in the <br />agricultural sector of the region, almost regardless of any climate change. There are some high- <br />value areas and specialty crops, of course, but in general the trend is downward as water moves <br />to municipal uses from low productivity extensive land uses. Hay alone was 41% of the crop <br />value in a non-drought year. The tourism, outdoor recreation, and amenity-driven population <br />growth are likely to increase in importance even if there is an increase in water availability. The <br />value of maintaining flexibility in water distribution, especially to keep alive the chances for <br />development of more specialty and high-value crops, may be particularly under-appreciated in the <br />West Slope area. (One is reminded of the specialty bean crops from Dove Creek and Cortez as <br />examples, and the wine and fruit business in Palisade, the Paonia area (especially before the <br />mining housing destroyed famous orchards - they may be back someday!), and the OJathe <br />sweet corn specialty crops; Green River melons, and so forth.) <br /> <br />The "overview" from the US GCRP National Assessment Synthesis Team is quite brief on each of <br />the regions and the sectors; for example. see the Great Plains: <br />http://www.usgcrp.gov/usgcrp/Library/nationalassessmenVoverviewgreatplains.htm <br /> <br />There is also the collection of regional assessments. and sector reports for the National <br />Assessment. These were synthesized into the "foundation document", which is another rendition. <br />One reason for the many editions is literally editing and reviewing by different panels and officials. <br />because of the heavy political weight of controversy over climate issues. The "water sector" <br />report is considered excellent <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.