Laserfiche WebLink
able to reap a good amount of money from the annual supply of water that comes <br />our way. Water management has to be governed by the laws of economics. <br />± <br />Does the SWSI process envision making decisions based upon projected urban <br />growth? Will SWSI also examine economic and other social impacts of its <br />decisions? Or will it strictly study water? <br />± <br />I believe that cities will eventually take agricultural water anyway. Where will <br />those cities get water if they don?t take it from agriculture? Shouldn?t this region <br />look at ways to get water from outside the basin or state before we build new <br />dams? <br />± <br />I hope this process reaches out to the groups that understand what they are <br />going through and what we are going through, and then comes up with solutions. <br />Water management practices worked well for 125 years but now it?s hard to have <br />50 interest groups taking pieces. The process should include all interests. <br />± <br />Rural Colorado doesn?t have the money to keep its water. Metropolitan areas can <br />afford the water. <br />