My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ColoradoComments28
CWCB
>
SWSI
>
DayForward
>
ColoradoComments28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 10:32:12 AM
Creation date
1/7/2008 3:43:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI
Basin
Colorado
Title
Comments 28
Date
2/2/2004
SWSI - Doc Type
Comments
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />02/02/2004 17:23 <br /> <br />7194813452 <br /> <br />PAGE 04 <br /> <br />. Union Park's pumped-storage and multj..basin delivery facilities can be permitted <br />and constructed in four self...funding phases over a 7 to15 year perjod. for a total cost <br />of about $3 billion; . <br /> <br />. Union Park's Phase I Dam1 TaY'lor~Union pump/generator facility~ and Union-Antero <br />Siphon to Denver and Co'orado Springs would cost about $1.5 bUlIon. Colorado <br />Springs and EI, Paso County would eventually need another gravity pipeline thr.ough <br />South Park to Rampart Reservoir above the Air Force Academy; <br /> <br />. Union Park~s Phase 2 pumped-storage filling and peaking power operation between <br />Blue Mesa and Union Park Reservoirs wourd cost about $900 milUon, including <br />severaf small fishing and irrigation reservoirs for locaJ Gunnison needs: <br /> <br />. Union ParkSs optional Phase 3 reversible interconnect pIpeline be~een Union Park <br />Reservoir and Fry-Ark's southern collection system could further enhance <br />efficiencies of existing reservoirs throughout four river basins for about $250 mHlion: <br /> <br />. Union Park's. optional Phase 4 pipeline branch from the Union-Antero high pressure <br />siphon can augment the Rio Grande Basin over Poncha Pass~ when neededJ for <br />droughts and endangered species needs, for about $250 million; <br /> <br />. Union Park1s high storage concept can substantially reduce regional evaporation <br />losses. i.e. 1 ~ feet annually from surface of Union Park V8. 7 feet from Lake Powell; <br /> <br />. Union Park's expected 1 0 to 1 benefit..cost ratio for enhancement of water rights and <br />utilities throughout five major river systems is about 5000/0 more efficient than any <br />other current or proposed Western water storage project; <br /> <br />. Union Park can Quickly solve regional water quality! endangered species~ farm dry- <br />up, Front Range growthl Black Canyon, Kansas shortages, etc~J without additional <br />dewatering of Colorado~s excessively depleted South Platte_ ArkansasJ and <br />Colorado Main Stem Rivers! as well as regional ground water reserves; <br /> <br />. Union Park can be owned and managed by cooperating Western and Eastern Slope <br />water providers; or a Statewide Water Authority; or a Regional Water Authority; <br /> <br />. Union Park~s unique hJgh altitude. multi-basin, pumped-storage water and power <br />enhancement concept can serve as a watershed pilot program to solve the Wesfs <br />escalating clean water and power crisis for future droughts and growth. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.