My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ColoradoComments03
CWCB
>
SWSI
>
DayForward
>
ColoradoComments03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 10:31:59 AM
Creation date
1/7/2008 1:58:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI
Basin
Colorado
Title
Comments 3
Date
8/25/2003
SWSI - Doc Type
Comments
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />, <br /> <br />3. The Fraser Valley in 2002 faced critical shortages that could only be <br />addressed by trading AMAX water for increased Denver bypasses. which <br />can no longer be done, since Aurora has that water, at least temporarily. <br />Denver indicated that another year of drought and they would completely <br />eliminate their bypass flows, which would decimate the fish and aquatic <br />environment as well as municipal and the small irrigation uses. Since <br />Denver has purchased most of the senior agricultural water rights, there is <br />very little flow h, the Fraser Valley that is not controlled by Denver. <br /> <br />4. As you knowt Grand and Summit County are the most impacted counties <br />by trans-basin diversions and that impact wHI increase with the <br />development of new projects by Denver and Northern. which underscores <br />the necessity for storage in Summit and Grand Counties. <br /> <br /> <br />SWC:cm <br />Enclosure <br />pc: Duane Scholl <br />Summit County Commissioners <br />Grand County Commissioners <br />Colorado River Water Conservation District <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />GCWSD#1 <br />WPWSD <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.