My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Colorado_BRT_Mtg_2_Summary
CWCB
>
SWSI
>
DayForward
>
Colorado_BRT_Mtg_2_Summary
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 10:31:56 AM
Creation date
1/7/2008 1:10:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI
Basin
Colorado
Title
Meeting Summary 2
Date
1/13/2004
SWSI - Doc Type
Summaries
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Colorado Basin Roundtable Technical Meeting #2 <br />Meeting Summary <br /> <br />benefits of higher than minimum flows in streams. It was pointed out that the SWSI process <br />may consider higher than minimum flows as an alternative; and would like to see specific <br />recommendations from the BRTs. <br />. CWCB Board can consider proposals to increase decreed flows for environment through their <br />new water rights acquisition program <br />. Instream rights are very junior and may therefore offer little environmental/ recreational <br />benefit <br />. Consider "paper water" (water right or legal entitlement) vs. "wet water" (actual quantities <br />observed) in forming alternatives to meet environmental/ recreational objectives; even <br />though the water right may indicate allocation of water to a specific user or stream segment, <br />the effects of variable hydrology on stream flows (and the fact that wet water flows are <br />sometimes less than the paper water values) should be accounted for in evaluating <br />alternatives. <br />. Several federal agencies address instream flows differently from one another (e.g., USFS vs. <br />others) - different methods (R2 Cross vs. others) may affect flow requirements on federal <br />lands <br />. Subdividing agricultural lands (e.g., 400-acre into 20-acre parcels) can increase irrigated acres <br />and should be considered in SWSI <br />. Check GIS coverage of Snowmass Village/ Aspen for land use data <br /> <br />Supply Methodology <br /> <br />Kelly DiNatale presented a brief overview of the methodology to be employed in SWSI for <br />estimating water supplies. The preliminary results of these analyses will be presented at BRT <br />#3. Feedback from the BRT members indicated that it is important in the Colorado Basin to <br />address where water is available, not just how much water is available. <br /> <br />Preparation for Basin Roundtable Meeting #3 <br /> <br />. BRT members were reminded of the following deadlines: <br />- Completed objectives weighting forms due back by January 27, 2004 (two weeks) <br />- Additional input on preliminary options list due by January 27, 2004 (two weeks) <br />- Comments on preliminary demand results due by January 27, 2004 (two weeks) <br />- Supply Methodology memo to be distributed by January 30, 2004 <br />- Comments on Supply Methodology due by February 13, 2004 <br />. Next BRT meeting will be held in Glenwood Springs (tentative location - Community Center) <br />on April 28, 2004 (2:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.) <br />. Gunnison BRT #3 scheduling notes <br />- Preliminary dates shown of 4/21/04 and 7/21/04 conflict with River District meeting <br />- Gunnison Water Workshop is 3rd or 4th week of July, should avoid scheduling Gunnison <br />BRT #3 during this event. <br /> <br />Public Comments <br /> <br />All public attendees at the BRT meeting were offered an opportunity to comment or ask <br />questions of the SWSI team and BRT members as part of the evening session of the BRT <br /> <br />CDIVI <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />Colorado BRT Mtg #2 Summary.doc 4/16/2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.