My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GunnisonComments07
CWCB
>
SWSI
>
DayForward
>
GunnisonComments07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 10:32:39 AM
Creation date
1/7/2008 11:23:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI
Basin
Gunnison
Title
Comments 7
Date
2/2/2004
SWSI - Doc Type
Comments
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />02/02/2004 17:23 <br /> <br />7194813452 <br /> <br />PAGE 04 <br /> <br />. Union park}s pumped-storage and multi-basin derivery facilities can be permitted <br />and constructed in four seff-funding phases over a 7 to15 year perjod I for a total cost <br />of about $3 billion; . <br /> <br />. Union ParkJs Phase I Daml Taylor-Union pump/generator facility, and Union-Antero <br />Siphon to Denver and Cororado Springs would cost about $1.5 billion. Colorado <br />Springs and EI. Paso County would eventuaUy need another gravity pjpeHne through <br />South Park to Rampart Reservoir above the Air Force Academy; <br /> <br />. Union Park's Phase 2 pumped.-storage filling and peaking power operation between <br />Blue Mesa and Union Park Reservojrs woufd cost about $900 million} including <br />severar sma" fishing and irrigation reservoirs for 'ocaf Gunnison needs; <br /> <br />. Union Parkds optional Phase 3 reversible interconnect pjpelfne be~een Union Park <br />ReseNoir and Fry-Arkts southern collection system could further enhance <br />efficiencies of existing reservoirs throughout four river basins for about $250 milHon~ <br /> <br />. Union Park's optional Phase 4 pipeline branch from the UnionwAntero high pressure <br />siphon can augment the Rio Grande Basin over Poncha Pass, when needed. for <br />droughts and endangered species needsJ for about $250 million; <br /> <br />. Union ParkJs hjgh storage concept can substantially reduce reg;onal evaporation <br />losses, La. 1 ~ feet annuaUy from surface of Union Park VSI 7 feet from Lake PowelJ; <br /> <br />. Union Park's expected 1 0 to 1 benefit~cost ratio for enhancement of water rights and <br />utilities throughout five major river systems is about 5000/0 more efficient than any <br />other current or proposed Western water storage project; <br /> <br />. Union Park can quickly solve regionaJ water quality. endangered species. farm dry- <br />up, Front Range growth) Black Canyon, Kansas shortages, etc.1 without additional <br />dewatering of CoforadoJs excessively depleted South Platte. Arkansas, and <br />Colorado Main Stem Rivers, as well as regional ground water reserves; <br /> <br />. Union Park can be owned and managed by cooperating Western and Eastern Slope <br />water providers; or a Statewide Water Authority; or a Regional Water Authority; <br /> <br />. Union Parkls unique high altitudet multi--basinJ pumped~storage water and power <br />enhancement concept can serve as a watershed pilot program to solve the Westls <br />escalating clean water and power crisis for future droughts and growth. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.