My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GunnisonComments02
CWCB
>
SWSI
>
DayForward
>
GunnisonComments02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 10:32:36 AM
Creation date
1/7/2008 10:48:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI
Basin
Gunnison
Title
Comments 2
Date
9/26/2003
SWSI - Doc Type
Comments
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />@ <br /> <br />Natural Energy Resources Company <br />P. Oll Box 567 Palmer Lake, CO 80133 <br />(719) 481N2003 Fax (719) 481R3452 <br /> <br />RECEIVED <br />SEP 3 0 2003 <br /> <br />fJotorado Water Conservatron Board <br /> <br />September 261 2003 <br /> <br />Mayor Paul Tauer <br />City of Aurora <br />1470 S. Havana <br />Aurora, CO 80012 <br /> <br />Mayor Lionel Rivera <br />City of Colorado Springs <br />P. O. Box 1576..1549 <br />Colorado Springs, CO 80903 <br /> <br />Subject: Consideration of Union Park Multi-purpose Water Storage Project <br /> <br />Dear Mayor Tauer and Mayor Rivera: <br /> <br />As Colorado-s fastest growing large cities! Aurora and Colorado Springs should defer their water <br />deveJo'pment plans, until an independent engineering assessment of Union ParkJs multiple <br />advantages is considered by elected officials. <br /> <br />Black and Veatch Engineers-Architects would be an ideal consulting firm to provide this <br />assessment. During the early 19805, Black and Veatch helped conceive Union Park's unique, <br />high storage, drought protection concept for both slopes. Jt also assisted with writing the 125 <br />page Unjon Park Reconnaissance Evaluation Study, dated October 1986. Black and Veatch <br />has an international reputation for objective water plannjng. It is also weJl versed with Colorado <br />water needs and solutions. <br /> <br />A preliminary sixty day engineering assessment 'would reveal the following fundamental <br />advantages for Union Park stakeholders throughout both sides of the Divide: <br /> <br />. Union Park's 1.2 milJion acre-feet of high. off-river Gunnison storage can save a four year <br />suppJy of Colorado's undeveloped 300,000 acre-feet Aspinall Pool. This pool represents <br />about a third of Colorado's unused Colorado River entitlements. These conserved wet year <br />flood losses will then be available for frexible gravity distribution throughout the Gunnison, <br />Colorado, Pfatte, Arkansas, and Rio Grande River Basins, when and where needed, during <br />drought cyc[es; <br /> <br />. Union Park's unique drought concept is more productive than five equaUy sized traditional <br />river dams.. The refiabiHty~ utility, and quality of existing water supplies will be greatly <br />increased throughout Colorado and the Southwestern Region, with Union Park; <br /> <br />. The off-peak pumping costs to fill Union Park from the Bureau of Reclamation's existing <br />Taylor Park and Blue Mesa Reservoirs wilJ be more than offset by revenues from Union <br />Park's high value peaking power and standby drought protection ca'pabilities; <br /> <br />. Union Park will only store Colorado's wasted Aspinall Pool development rights. These rights <br />were authorized by Congress in 1957 for Gunnison Basin of origin growth needs (601000 <br />acre-feet) and state-wide needs (240,000 acre-feet). Since 1957, Gunnison Basin <br />consumptjve needs have declined more that 30%, because of its continuing conversion from <br />irrigated farming to tourism. As a resultl CoJorado~s costly Gunnison losses to California <br />have been increasing; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.