Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Comments to SWSlt November 3,2003, by John Wiener <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />· Loss of prairie wetlands and pothofes is expected to impact waterfowl and wildlife habitats; <br />perhaps creating premium on remaining conserved habitats and riparian wetJands? Can this <br />increased value he useful for rural and agricultural interests? <br /> <br />. Greater number of droughts and ffoodst with extremes affecting aU water uses. Water <br />distribution systems, including irrigation ditohes, may be more vulnerabfe to flash floods and <br />to sedimentation problems from overland flows. <br /> <br />. Greater proportion of precipitation in form of intense rainfalls and therefore increased impacts <br />on soils, and changes in sedimentationJ susceptibility to wind erosion, and potential changes <br />in vegetation present or advantaged by different conditions (invasives specjes?)" And, <br />implications for non-point poUution and run-off from agriculture and rangelands? <br /> <br />· Disproportionate stress on family/small farms and ranches due to different and lesser <br />capitalization than large agricultural businesses (best discussion of this in Ojima at at Great <br />Plains Assessment; some discussion in Reiny at al,. 2001 Agricurture Sector report.) <br /> <br />. U.S. Agriculture as a whole is predicted to be increased in totaf productivity, which wiU not <br />he'p Colorado (or non-California West) agricu~ture become more competitive -- in fact, <br />perhaps another push toward being less competitive as local conditions worsen whiJe general <br />production increases? <br /> <br />. Forest changes along with weather and cUmate changes may affect recreationar opportunity <br />adversefy in some ways and favorably in other ways, perhaps creating new opportunities or <br />demands for other competing recreational destinations. The same pressure or opportunity <br />may arise from changes in fire behavior or changes in the forests at higher artitudes which <br />make them less attractive. <br /> <br />These are a highly generalized set of notes, and again, there is a very serious <br />question as to how these influences would play out in any given place even if <br />they are correctly forecast. The forecast accuracy is not easily judged, either, <br />though responsible critics have made some important points, such as those by <br />Dr. Pielke Sr. and his colleagues, as noted above at this beginning of this point. <br />So, right now, uncertainty is certain, but the additional stresses which the SWSI <br />process win reconsider and develop, in the supply and demand studies, are <br />going to interact with the crimate variability somehow. Therefore, conservative <br />judgement seems very important - keep all the pieces, keep the options open, <br />and avoid putting aU the eggs in one basket. The critical link of these concerns to <br />those noted for the agricultural and rural economies must surely suggest the <br />wisdom of maintaining a strong rural economy and a living farming and ranching <br />economy) for everyonets benefit - from the urban and rural human populations to <br />the qualities they value. <br /> <br />Appendix: A plea for eng ineerin 9 support... <br />