SouthPlatteComments04 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

objective (i.e~, "Provide water where needed to protect and enhance aquatic habitat") I was pleased to see water quality recognized as an important consideration under the fourth subobjective. (7) Promote Cost-Effectiveness. The second subobjective refers to promoting positive cost/benefit While I do not object to the concept, it is important that the analysis of benefits and costs includes the full range of costs (including environmental) and not just the direct costs that are most easily quantified. I would also emphasize that efficiency improvements can be among the most cost-effective options for meeting water needs. (8) Protect Cultural Values. I'm not certain how water supply projects and programs can "protect, encourage, and enhance cultural diversity.'; If there is something CWCB or CDM had in mind with this objective, perhaps you can state it more clearly. The fifth subobjective ("minimize harm to downstream users") seems out of place - does this not, like the compact issue mentioned above, fall into the realm of non-discretionary actions given the prohibition against injury under Colorado water law? (9) Provide for Healthy Colorado EconomY4 This seems a little grandiose. Water supply cannot provide for a healthy Colorado economy - the state of Colorado's economy will be shaped by a far broader range of forces. I do appreciate the basin protection sentiment behind the third subobjective - the idea that one basin's economy (and environment) should not be sacrificed for another's, but that we need solutions that work for all of Colorado. Perhaps this goal could be recast to look at managing water resources in a manner consistent with maintaining a healthy Colorado economy, or something of that kind - so that water does not become a barrier to a healthy economy even though water supply cannot assure or "provide for" a health economy itself. (10) Provide for Operational Flexibility. The first subobjective is oddly worded - it seemS to have to do with short-term transfer of uses to some other "higher beneficial use~' (perhaps a dry-year ag to urban lease?). But it is impossible to shift the water to that other use on the one hand and at the same time still maintain the original use on the other. Of course" it would be possible to maintain the historic rights, and to return the historic use after the short-term transfer. This subobjective should be modified to more clearly explain its purpose, which I take to be encouraging interruptible supply arrangements that maintain agricultural uses long--term while providing short-term 'insurance' for urban uses during dry periods. Another subobjective that could be added here (or perhaps under #2 or #3) would be to "Improve infrastructure connectivity to move water from where supplies are to where they are needed."