Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />~ '-1 <br />Mosteller, Douglas <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />From: <br />~ent: <br />0: <br />Subject: <br /> <br />Brownr Rick [Rick.Brown@dwr.state.co.us] <br />Tuesday, September 30, 2003 3:34 PM <br />Mosteller, Douglas; DiNatale, Kelly; Morea, Susan <br />FW: references <br /> <br />This was the gentleman that spoke at the South Platte Denver meeting. At times it was <br />hard to identify the points he was making but he has added a few refernces to help. <br /> <br />Rick <br /> <br />---~~Original Message----- <br />From: John Wiener Imailto:John.Wiener@Colorado.EDU] <br />Sent: TuesdaYI September 16~ 2003 12:15 PM <br />To; Brown, Rick <br />Subject: referencee <br /> <br />Dear Rick -- <br /> <br />I sent this last F~iday and mis-addressed you. I beg your pardon! 1 know <br />youtre in Montrose this weekl and this isn't very urgent, but I wanted to <br />follow up. Hope your travels were pleasant! I don1t know how many times <br />you get to hear the same thingst but it certainly is fascinating from the <br />outside -- the SWS1, perhaps like the CWCB itself, is looking like a window <br />into the whole planning/policy/public role cluster of issues, and I ~m very <br />pleased to have this going on. <br /> <br />Thanks! I'll send a note on some of the quality-of~life stuff when r get <br />some review of those things~ <br /> <br />ohn <br /> <br />>Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:56:14 -0600 <br />>To: kellydinatale, moreasc@cdm.com, rick.brown@cwcb.state.co.us <br />>From~ John Wiener <John.Wiener@Colorado~EDU> <br />>Subject: references <br />>Cc: chuckhowe <br />> <br />>Dear Friends in the SWSI: <br />> <br />>Since I was not prepared in advance when I made some comments at the <br />>Denver and Pueblo meetings last week, here are some references that might <br />>he usefu14 In generall of course, there are thousands of items related to <br />>the traditional means of analyses of water projects, as Dr. Howe mentioned <br />>in Pueblo, and you probably already know more than you wanted to about <br />>some of the controversies over cost-benefit analysis and what should or <br />>should not be included 4 Cost-benefitl in fact, was first put into policy <br />>in water project studies, starting with the 1936 Flood Control Act~ <br />> <br />> <br />>The article I mentioned at Ark Basin roundtable public comment: <br /> <br />> <br /> <br />>Gates, T. K~, Burkhalter, J~ P41 Labadie, J. W.( Valliant, J. C., and <br />>Broner, I. 2002. Monitoring and modeling flow and salt transport in a <br />>salinity-threatened irrigated valley. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage <br />>Engineering, ASCE~ 128(2), 87 - 99. <br />> This can be downloaded from the website; browse to journal name, then to <br />issue. <br /> <br />> <br />>Regarding amenity values driving rural growth in the u.s. and <br /> <br />1 <br />