My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ISFAPPC01555
CWCB
>
Instream Flow Appropriations
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
ISFAPPC01555
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2017 12:35:58 PM
Creation date
1/4/2008 11:04:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Instream Flow Appropriations
Case Number
04CW0157
Stream Name
Dyke Creek
Watershed
North Fork Gunnison
Water Division
4
Water District
40
County
Delta
Instream Flow App - Doc Type
Supplemental Data
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Summary <br />The information contained in this report and the associated instream flow file folder forms the <br />basis for staff s instream flow recommendation to be considered by the Board. It is staff s <br />opinion that the information contained in this report is sufficient to support the findings required <br />in Rule 5.40. <br /> <br />Colorado's Instream Flow Program was created in 1973 when the Colorado State Legislature <br />recognized "the need to correlate the activities of mankind with some reasonable preservation of <br />the natural environment" (see 37-92-102 (3) C.R.S.). The statute vests the CWCB with the <br />exclusive authority to appropriate and acquire instream flow and natural lake level water rights. <br />In order to encourage other entities to participate in Colorado's Instream Flow Program, the <br />statute directs the CWCB to request instream flow recommendations from other state and federal <br />agencies. The United States Forest Service (USFS) recommended this segment of Dyke Creek to <br />the CWCB for inclusion into the Instream Flow Program. Dyke Creek is being considered for <br />inclusion into the Instream Flow Program because it has a natural environment that can be <br />preserved to a reasonable degree with an instream flow water right. The USFS is very interested <br />in protecting stream flows because Dyke Creek is currently an unregulated stream for much of its <br />length. Forest Service investigations (unpublished) have suggested that this is a fully functioning <br />aquatic system that is contributing towards the agency stewardship mission of protecting <br />sustainable ecosystems. This stream provides occupied habitat for native Colorado River <br />Cutthroat Trout. Establishment of an instream flow water right would be consistent with the <br />Conservation Agreement and Strategy For Colorado River Cutthroat Trout, April 2001, which <br />has a stated goal of "To maintain areas which currently support abundant Colorado River <br />cutthroat trout and manage other areas for increased abundance". <br /> <br />Dyke Creek is 6.8 miles long. It begins on the Eastern flank of Chalk Mountain at an elevation <br />of approximately 10,200 feet and terminates at the confluence with West Muddy Creek at an <br />elevation of approximately 8,600 feet. The entire 5.2-mile segment addressed by this report is <br />located on federal lands. Dyke Creek is located within Delta County. The total drainage area of <br />the creek is approximately 4.7 square miles. Dyke Creek generally flows in an easterly direction. <br /> <br />The subject of this report is a segment of Dyke Creek beginning at an Unnamed Lake at 10,225 <br />feet in elevation and extending downstream to the confluence with the Bell Ranch Diversion #1, <br />elevation 9,000 feet (see Map). The proposed segment is located 20 miles southeast of the Town <br />of Collbran. The staff has received only one recommendation for this segment, from the USFS. <br />The recommendation for this segment is discussed below. <br /> <br />Instream Flow Recommendation(s) <br /> <br />USFS recommended 3.2 cfs, spring and summer; 1.5 cfs late summer and fall; and 1 cfs, winter, <br />based on its June 18, 2003 data collection efforts (see Appendix A). Three cross sections were <br />surveyed on Dyke Creek. Cross sections # 1 and #3 were dropped as a basis for flow <br />recommendation due to problems with confidence intervals. The problem with #1 is the survey <br />was conducted during a period the channel was de-watered by the Bell Ranch diversions located <br />upstream. The problem with #3 are less obvious, but are most likely due to the selection of the <br />x-section location and its morphology. As a result recommendations are based solely on x- <br /> <br />- 2 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.