My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PIM.Alamosa.FINAL_11.10
CWCB
>
SWSI
>
DayForward
>
PIM.Alamosa.FINAL_11.10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 10:33:07 AM
Creation date
1/4/2008 10:55:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI
Basin
Rio Grande
Title
Public Information Meeting - Alamosa
Date
9/3/2003
SWSI - Doc Type
Summaries
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Public Suggestions: <br /> <br />~ Get studies and data from the Rio Grande Water Conservation District and the <br />State Engineer's Office from the numerous public-planning sessions they have <br />held over the last several years concerning water in this basin, growth and the <br />enlargement of the Rio Grande Reservoir. <br /> <br />Comments: <br /> <br />The comments below recap the concerns, issues and questions that were raised at the <br />basin's Public Information Meeting. These are general summaries of what was said, <br />grouped by key theme, and are not verbatim quotes from the participants. The <br />suggestions, comments and questions documented here will be incorporated into the SWSI <br />study process. This public input is greatly appreciated, as it will help guide the SWSI study <br />team as the process moves forward. The SWSI team will seek to answer any questions <br />raised at these meetings, and will include these answers as part of the SWSI final report. <br /> <br />The basin needs to improve water manaf!ement for the future: <br /> <br />o The Rio Grande basin receives a fixed supply of water every year. There is no <br />way to increase the amount of water we get. This basin needs to do a better job <br />of managing what we have. <br />o Would diversions to aquifer storage be possible to reduce flooding of the Alamosa <br />River at its termination point? <br />o Everyone in the basin has been guilty of not using water in a way that respects all <br />water users in the basin. SWSI needs to recognize the changing nature of the <br />basin and collectively determine going forward what everyone can do to better <br />manage the resources. <br />o This region's residents need to determine what we want the future to be and what <br />we want our Valley to look like. <br /> <br />The aquifer levels need to be recharf!ed: <br /> <br />o The decline in the amount of water in the aquifer is a very significant concern. <br />There is a widespread understanding of the need to take action to recharge the <br />aquifer. The aquifer was characterized as the largest "underground storage <br />reservoir" in the state without the evaporation that surface reservoirs experience. <br />o Maintaining the water level in the aquifer is vital for drought protection, water <br />supplies, fulfillment of the compact requirements, wetlands, and recreation. The <br />impact of the decline in the water level in the aquifer, therefore, is far reaching <br />and impacts the water supply throughout the basin. <br />o It was suggested that a taxing district be created that would pay farmers to not <br />farm for a limited period of time so the water savings could be used to recharge <br />the aquifer. <br /> <br />GBSM, SWSI Public Information Meeting Summary, 11.10.03 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.