Laserfiche WebLink
<br />San Juan/Dolores/San Miguel Basin Roundtable Technical Meeting #4 <br />Meeting Summary <br /> <br />Final Gap Analysis <br /> <br />Kelly DiNatale presented the final gap analysis numbers for the SJDSM Basin and how the gaps <br />were determined using the demand revisions. Kelly also reviewed the statewide demand <br />figures, including an estimate of the remaining gross demand shortfall, or gap. The general <br />locations of the remaining gap for each basin were also presented, as well as the additional <br />uncertainty with the planned projects and processes going forward. Where applicable for each <br />basin, provider level data were obtained and these were discussed along with general supply <br />options. The estimated gross demand shortfall was reviewed on a county level for the SJDSM <br />Basin, along with more specific information on the areas of gap occurrence and additional <br />applicable details. Demand projection information developed under SWSI will be posted to the <br />SWSI web site (www.cwcb.state.co.us). <br /> <br />Agricultural demands, potential changes in irrigated acres for each of the eight basins and the <br />SJDSM specifically, and locations of agricultural shortages were also presented by Kelly. <br /> <br />Feedback from the BRT members on the gap analysis material follows. <br /> <br />. The South Platte and Arkansas basins have the largest M&I gap due to population growth in <br />areas outside service boundaries. <br />. The Durango Water Company should be included in the estimate of the supply/demand <br />gap. The Durango Water Company serves approximately 1,000 homes in the Animas Valley <br />north of Durango using wells, with potential for growth. The Animas-La Plata Project could <br />bring a need for augmentation due to calls. Existing water rights should be sufficient for <br />growth. Ed Zink can provide additional info. <br />. The uncertainty in the gap is estimated as 25 to 50 percent of the "Identified Projects and <br />Processes" yield. The 3,500-6,900 AFY uncertainty presented on the map figure for the SJDSM <br />basin does not include agriculture, environmental or recreation. <br />. The 25 to 50 percent uncertainty may be too low for SJDSM Identified Projects and Processes <br />- 60 to 70 percent may be more realistic. <br />. Consider presenting the water supply gap as a range- in this case, 5,000 AFY base gap, <br />possibly as high as 8,500-11,900 AFY (depending on uncertainty percentage). <br />. The firm yield of existing rights can affect their uncertainty percentage - instream flows also <br />can affect certainty of supplies. <br />. Projecting out 30 years has some inherent uncertainty, and that instream flows are part of <br />balanced water use. <br />. The current drought appears to have brought additional conservation savings for some water <br />providers, such as the Pagosa Area Water & Sanitation District. <br />. The group should consider a potential Lower Colorado River call on the San Juan and other <br />basins. The State Engineer's Office has put together a work group to consider the <br />implications and administration of a call. The Yampa was identified as the most junior basin <br />- the SJDSM is "in the middle" priority-wise. <br />. Localized agricultural shortages within a district may not be reflected in the district-wide <br />/I average" shortage value shown in the presentation. <br />. District 33 includes compact obligations with NM. <br /> <br />CDIVI <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />SJD BRT Mtg #4 Summary.doc 11/29/2004 <br />