My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PIM.DoveCreek.FINAL_11.10
CWCB
>
SWSI
>
DayForward
>
PIM.DoveCreek.FINAL_11.10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2009 1:15:34 PM
Creation date
1/4/2008 10:03:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI
Basin
Southwest
Title
Public Information Meeting - Dove Creek
Date
9/4/2003
SWSI - Doc Type
Summaries
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />o SWSI needs to be very careful to adequately account for future demand. Because <br />after SWSI is done, the basins that are looking for water will go to those who <br />aren't growing as much and say, "give us your water because you aren't growing <br />like we are." <br />o SWSI needs to look at existing storage projects, their original purposes and <br />storage capacity, and then look at current demand and usage on the storage <br />projects before building new ones. <br />o Consider the timing of releasing stored water. SWSI needs to look at historic flow <br />records, and then the decrease of agricultural activity and irrigation to determine <br />when and how to release water. There also will be a significant drop in flow of the <br />Dolores and San Miguel rivers in the mid to late summer time. <br />o The Warren Act allows water to be stored in federal projects. <br />o A problem that I see that is unique to this basin, or for any basin that is close to <br />a state border, is that we want to preserve our water before it leaves the state. <br />We need to make sure that state-border communities aren't the scapegoats for <br />the upper basin. The state-border communities are the most vocal in trying to <br />keep water in our basin. <br />o In the CWCB fact sheet, it says that the Delores/San Juan accounts for 23% of <br />the total river flow that leaves Colorado. How much can be used by Colorado and <br />how much has to go downstream? <br />o The problem in Durango is, how can we ensure that future growth has highly <br />efficient water use? We have an opportunity because the future population is not <br />here yet, and it will be easier to prescribe water use to newcomers, as opposed <br />to changing the behavior of the existing population. <br />o Our basin needs support for recovery programs. One of our greatest threats to <br />developing water is how the government administers the Endangered Species Act. <br />o When SWSI examines reuse and conservation, be advised that some people's <br />senior water rights depend on flows that come from normal use. Therefore, <br />conservation may actually hurt senior water rights. <br /> <br />Educate oeoole that water is not unlimited: <br /> <br />o Increase the awareness of where water users are getting their water. SWSI <br />needs an educating process to teach people how and where people are getting <br />water, and realizing that one affects the other. The state has not done a good job <br />of teaching people where they get their water from. Hopefully, a SWSI education <br />process will make the public more mindful of where they get water, and how they <br />use it. <br /> <br />GBSM, SWSI Public Information Meeting Summary, 11.10.03 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.