My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD11217
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1
>
FLOOD11217
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:12:17 AM
Creation date
12/28/2007 3:56:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Jefferson
Arapahoe
Basin
South Platte
Title
Chatfield Reallocation Study: Meeting Minutes 06/05/2007
Date
6/5/2007
Prepared For
Meeting Participants
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Meeting Summary
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Chatfield Reservoir Reallocation Project <br />Washington, DC Agenda <br />June 18 and 19, 2007 <br /> <br />. Future federal funding: <br />What is our best CUIrent thinking regarding FY08 and FY09 costs for USACE? <br />What is the future timing when cost issues will be better defmed/refined? <br />. Cost of storagelWRDA: <br />What information does HQ have regarding the various WRDA issues? <br />Key issues include how does the Senate language impact ER 1105-2-100 stated policies? <br />· Incorporating agricultural water into FR/EIS: <br />How does HQ view the agricultural water position regarding simplifying the EISIFR? <br />Can we keep the authorization provided in WRDA 1986 even if agricultural use is <br />considered only qualitatively, and temporary? <br />Can we have a hand in the crafting of the ROD? <br />How can the ROD be hancUed giving CWCB the maximum flexibility with respect to <br />future water contracts? <br />· Project schedule including environmental and recreational mitigation: <br />What is the timing of the environmental mitigation contracting for design and <br />construction? <br />Can locals move forward with recreational and environmental mitigation design before <br />the ROD is executed? <br />. Oversight of recreational mitigation: <br />How will USACE review and approve design and construction? <br />To what extent is USACE approval of recreational mitigation required? <br />How will recreational and environmental mitigation activities be coordinated/integrated <br />(examples)? <br /> <br />The purpose of the Washington trip is to continue to educate and communicate with the congressional <br />delegation and others as well as continue the dialogue with Corps HQ on these issues. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.