Laserfiche WebLink
<br />David: One more comment on cost of storage issue - reminder at January meeting, Steve Coombs was at that meeting, <br />Steve told us at that time his intent was to try to get that resolved internally, so that adds some context to this issue. We <br />have been patiently awaiting what progress on that issue. Then Steve retired officially, then came back to work months <br />later at a different office. But Steve said he'll be at the meeting, so I wanted to offer that. <br /> <br />Rick: Hope he still has some say <br /> <br />David: I thought he was feeling pretty strongly about it. <br /> <br />Rick: Have we missed the possibility of getting it taken away? <br /> <br />Person Behind David: We don't know what that will be. What was in the senate bill did not get in the conference report. <br /> <br />Rick: Then our desired language didn't get in the report? <br /> <br />Person Behind David: We don't know what our desired language was exactly. Weare not sure how that would affect the <br />calculations in the corps figures. <br /> <br />Tom: As far as schedule goes, we heard Eric say the contract mod was on the way, we have some EDOD work being done. <br /> <br />Kent(?): We have some people getting 770 process up. <br /> <br />Tom: I see those as seeing two of the critical path items, modeling and EDOD work that would provide the information to <br />make that preliminary draft whole. Haven't heard anyone from the Corps who said Sept 23 would be the final date. <br /> <br />Betty: Said there would be some hope. <br /> <br />Tom: Anything else on schedule? Project mitigation - we had a subcommittee meeting in August and I owe you a recap <br />and summary of that meeting, we will be meeting again Sept 20th. Any questions on that? <br /> <br />Rod K: After that meeting, Douglas County approached me, they have a water bank that they have significant resources <br />already in, they are at this point ready to commit this for mitigation for upstream users in Douglas, some of the benefits that <br />have accrued that some haven't taken credit for may come back to Douglas. I mentioned type of land development in <br />Douglas and Arapahoe County, because they are high end developments where you get open space and drainage space, <br />could generate credits. <br /> <br />Rick: Is that on the list of 38 projects. "wetlands bank"? <br /> <br />Betty: That was a suggestion made by... <br /> <br />Rick: By me. <br /> <br />Betty: You weren't at that meeting. But that suggestion was made, and I am assuming that TT included that in updating <br />the table. <br /> <br />Rod: I made that suggestion. <br /> <br />John: I called Cheryl Matthews and they were very receptive, planned on having Eric or some of you folks do it. I assume <br />Cheryl will talk with Brook and coordinate that briefing. <br /> <br />Betty: I'm glad she's getting involved. <br /> <br />Tom: Anything else on Mitigation? To wrap up... so let's see, we have the Sept 20 subcommittee, 23 -25 DC trip, 28th <br />tentative meet with Corps at TT office, waiting for confirmation, next coordination meeting is Oct 2nd. Progress meeting is <br />9 am. Will get back to everyone with confirmation on date and time. <br /> <br />Betty: Item lOc - what is date? <br /> <br />Tom: The 28th, and its tentative. <br /> <br />14 <br />