My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD11206
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1
>
FLOOD11206
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:12:17 AM
Creation date
12/28/2007 3:51:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Jefferson
Arapahoe
Basin
South Platte
Title
Chatfield Reallocation Study: Meeting Minutes 11/06/2007
Date
11/6/2007
Prepared For
Meeting Participants
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Meeting Summary
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />10) Seismic Issues <br /> <br />Tom: Had a conversation, got an add-on so that Chatfield is tagged onto study, local firm <br />WLA specializing on this kind of work, expect to have a draft in December, and a <br />meeting in January to go over the results. Just one piece, that says that at Chatfield site <br />what would be the expected ground motion from a specific siesmic event. It's either <br />Houston we have a problem or we don't. Have to chase this down so we get an answer. <br />Things on the work, and need about $100K in FY 08 to continue this seismic study for <br />Chatfield, trying to figure how to pay for this. Hope for Corp O&M money, or we agree <br />to reduce in-kind services, there might be other options. Any questions on this? This is <br />ground motion study as part of Phase I. So may put pressure on Dave and Marge get this <br />money. <br /> <br />Sandy: Don't know if the O&M budget could support this. <br /> <br />Tom: Know all funds are spoken for. <br /> <br />Marge: Lets talk and see if we could make a case for this. <br /> <br />Rick: If the ground motion study says no problem, still need $1 OOK? Because its only <br />part of Phase I? <br /> <br />Tom: Ground Motion study will tell you what would happen in an event, other part of it <br />is what it means for the dam. They have to study that regardless. I think that's how it <br />works. <br /> <br />David: I understood it was $60K was for phase I. I agree with you, we need to be sure <br />the money is going to be there in place. <br /> <br />Rick: Could the $100K come out of the $600K that the CWCB just got? <br /> <br />Tom: Yes, but keep in mind that it has to stay in the 50/50 balance. Perhaps reducing the <br />in-kind share. Corps is looking into the possibility of doling the seismic outside of the <br />project so we don't upset the 50/50 balance. <br /> <br />11) Action Items/N ext Meeting <br /> <br />Tom: Next Meeting - 18t Tuesday of December, 1 :30 this room Thanks for coming <br />Next meeting, have responses to proposal from Mount Carbon (Kevin Kinnear) <br />appreciate some feedback before next meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.