FLOOD11203 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

might be a lawyer to help us out, a third potential assistant here. I did a simple spreadsheet here, because the environmental restoration won't continue through the 2008, don't know how the instream parties will work with that. I did both with and without the instream group as sharing these 2008 expenses. So in a way, wanting to do a budget here, its as high as this, or low, or something like, put something in your budget as a placeholder, and maybe we can cover this through this next year. (?) Rick, do you have a justification for this... asterisk?.. Rick: Not the asterisks showing where these numbers came out of. Jeff Shoemaker - It was an 80/20 split between downstream and instream the first year, and this current year was still an 80/20 split, but the 80 was split between upstream and downstream. Correct, Rick, that the key factor has been at the end of the days that there is an environmental gain. Questions is if there isn't a lot of ER work done in 08, but what has been done will be a benefit, it is a good reason to contribute to next year. Rick - I can't quantify those benefits, but there will be benefits, like more water for Littleton, these are just ballpark possibilities. What this thing might look like.... McAuliffe - Did Tom go through this with you? I will go through this. The way this will work, we will have to get the authority, (draws on white board). Two major components, environmental components and recreational components. We will know what we will have to mitigate when the DEIS is out. When that happens, House Bill? By end of May 2008, this HB will give the CWCB authority to do this project and everything entailed. Coinciding with this HB, and the DEIS, we propose go out with two RFQs, and those are based on focusing the consulting community... takes a huge amount of activity, focus them on result of consultant selection by January 2009. At that point, would then award to the consultant selected the project of design and implementation of the Plan. Both of these things will give us our dollar amounts. Forecasting: $40 million each. That's the whole: design, implementation and construction, and the cost of the consultants. Then manage the proj ect, between us and the Corps, so that based on all of this, you have your water in Chatfield. (WI C). So the key is starting in this time period, need the DEIS first, putting together the scope of what would be in those RFQs. In Recreational, what would consultant have to bring? With Environment, same thing, scoping of these and the implementation order to get qualified design and implementation, what we are talking about is two $40 million project. Group wants these designed and implemented as soon as possible. Lisa Darling: Coordination with consultants? McAuliffe: These are your consultants, the people hired would be working with CWCB to be scoping the RFQs , so couldn't make a bid. Dave Giger: What if we submit an RFQ? This document represents the personal staff notes of Susan Maul and are not to be considered a formal record of this meeting. 3