Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the next two years as we move to wet water. Staff was fairly shocked and delighted that <br />there is no ask for a whole lot of Federal money. (Sen. Allard is currently the ranking <br />person in Congress from Colorado. When Sen. Allard departs in about 19 months, <br />Congresswoman DeGette will be the most senior member of the Colorado delegation. <br />These senior members tend to wield more influence.) The staff was told the $100m is <br />coming from the fifteen local entities, and the Fed's participation is likely limited to <br />funding to oversee the process as it moves through contracting with CWCB. This <br />meeting was a green light. Thanks to Marge and Dave. It was obvious the Congressional <br />staffers rely heavily upon the work of these expert lobbyists to clarify history, status, and <br />details of what are sometimes arcane issues. David and Marge visited each of the <br />remaining four House members' offices and delivered material to the staff members who <br />were unable to attend the group meeting. They have followed up with emails and phone <br />calls. <br /> <br />Sen. Allard's Staff <br />The Chatfield contingent has met previously with Mandi McKinley. This time Chief of <br />Staff Sean Conway also attended the meeting. The meeting was a brief overview and <br />update that lasted thirty minutes. The contingent was told that Chatfield has been ranked <br />as a "priority" by Sen. Allard. (In as much as he is on the Senate Appropriations <br />Committee, this is happy news.) The required federal funding to get to wet water must be <br />approved by Congress. Last year the President zeroed-out funding for all water projects <br />from his budget. Sen. Allard included an "earmark", but then Congress was unable to <br />pass any FY07 domestic appropriations bills. Funding for continuation of the Chatfield <br />FR/EIS came through the Corps FY07 Work Plan, which was developed after passage of <br />the Continuing Resolution by Congress in lieu of the Appropriations Bill. Local funds <br />from the fifteen participants, CWCB, and the Interbasin Roundtable 179 process are <br />brought together to match the Federal contribution.) The Senator's staff thanked the <br />contingent for making their jobs easier. They praised this Chatfield political effort as <br />being done really right. <br /> <br />John Lagomarcino probed the possibilities of the Senator facilitating a meeting between <br />the contingent and policy makers at the President's Office of Management and Budget <br />(OMB), to see if it might be possible to include money for Chatfield Reallocation in the <br />President's last budget before he leaves office. If such a meeting is deemed appropriate, <br />it would likely be in the August timeframe, and only a couple people from the contingent <br />would need to go back for that session. <br /> <br />Next Steps <br />A broader follow-up trip to DC on Chatfield Reallocation is being scheduled for late <br />September. If any organizations have not written checks to support this lobbying and <br />consulting effort, let me ask you to PLEASE take a moment to do so at this time! This <br />consulting and lobbying effort is a helpful and productive way to get wet water in <br />Chatfield in a timely fashion. We could not perform this task by ourselves. Similarly, <br />local non-Federal sponsor CWCB has clearly stated it does not have the staff or resources <br />to make this portion of the process happen. The consulting and lobbying team that has <br />been assembled conducts business in a very professional manner. I've now seen this <br />