My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
NonBasicSpecificComments04
CWCB
>
SWSI
>
DayForward
>
NonBasicSpecificComments04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2009 1:13:48 PM
Creation date
12/28/2007 9:18:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
SWSI
Title
Comments 4
Date
10/23/2003
SWSI - Doc Type
Comments
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. . <br /> <br />214 <br /> <br />2 000 ~.~ .,~.... .~._- c...._ --. -- -....... H <br /> <br />BRlAN D. RICHTER ET Ai. <br /> <br />Ecological AppUcatiol1s <br />Vol 13, No.1 <br /> <br />'...... ..... -n . ,_~.""'H . .... ....... H - ...-. -. .. __.n~.'O- <. -.. .-........ ...c_ ..~- -..-----u.............l <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />f <br />[ <br />I <br />~ <br /> <br />} <br />Ii <br />;I: <br />: <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1 500 <br /> <br />~ <br />oS <br />~ 1 000 <br />.[[ <br />~ <br />0:' <br /> <br /> <br />500 <br /> <br />o Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jut Aug Sap Oct Nov Dee <br /> <br />FJG.6. Silnulated nafural flows during L~85 (black line) for the ApalachicoJa River are compared with ftO\VS that would <br />occur under pmposed future (2030) human deluands and dam operations (gray line), as prescribed in the January 2002'Florida <br />proposal. This conlpa'rison suggests' that the riverts naturai flow variability can be protected to a high degree under projected <br />developnlent ?onditions. . , <br /> <br />et a1. 1996). Statistical assessment of the differences <br />between human-influenced flow conditions and eco- <br />system requit'ements can help quantify .the magnitude <br />of potential conflicts (Richter et at. 1996). <br />When human..influ~nced flow regimes are. found to <br />be iQcompatible with ecosystem flow requirenlents (ei- <br />ther presently or in the future)t water l11anagers, sci- <br />entists) water users, and conservationists will need to <br />seek ways of alleviating the conflic~s, as discussed hI <br />the next step. . <br /> <br />STEP 4: COLLABORATJVBLY SEARCH1'NG <br />FOR SOLUTIONS <br /> <br />Once the areas of potential inoonlpatibility have been <br />w~lJ defined and bounded in space and tiIne as de- <br />scribed previously, options for reducing or e~inlinating <br />conflicts between hUlnan and ecosysten1 needs can ,be <br />explored ill an open dialogue among stakeholders. Fos.. . <br />tering a collaborative dialogue among those affected <br />by water managelnent decisions \vill help clarify val- <br />ues~ share information, and build trust between partie.. <br />ipantst making it far easier to build the consenS'l1S need.. <br />ed to develop and implell1ent ecologically sustainable <br />water lnanagement (Bingham 19863 Howitt' 1992, Ax- <br />elrod J 994~ Rogers al1d Bestbier 1997). <br />Human needs) desires) and preferences, inclu.ding <br />those pertaining to river eco'8ystenl protection or res- <br />toration, should be expressed. as a set of goals that <br />collectively represent stakeholder intetestS4 This set of <br />goals represents the desired integration of human and, <br />ecosystem needs. Rogers and Bestbier (1997) suggest <br />a franlework called all "objective~ hierarchyH for such <br />goal setting. This objectives hierarchy begins with fOl.- <br />mulation 9f a broad management visi~n, includes Inore <br /> <br />specific management goals that. give better definition <br />. to the vision, and is ultim,ately underpinned by a set of <br />specific, quanti.fled objectives (expressed as "thres.h- <br />oIds ?f possible concern" in Table 2),- which provide <br />managers with n1a.nagement targets. Quantified objec- <br />ti yes can include proposed levels - of hydropower gen... <br />erati.on~ delivery of water supplies) management ofl'es- <br />ervoir lake levels, and other human interests as well <br />as ecosystem t~gets. <br />In this step of O\1r framework, stakeholders.negotiate <br />to have their desires or needs expressed in the set of <br />mutually agreeable goals. that will drive. water man- <br />agement activities. We' believe tb.at ecologically sus- <br />tainable water managemel1t ultimately depends upon <br />mutual cOlnnlitment to a basic philosophy that no one <br />wins unless everyone wins; conservationists must. <br />strive to meet human needs while water managers. COIn.. <br />rnit to meeting ecosystem Tequirenlents. When all par.. <br />ties are engaged in \vorking toward ecologically StlS- <br />taillable water management, the power of hunlan in- . <br />genuity can be optimally directed. <br />During the fonl'utlation of mutually agreeable goals~ <br />some of the incompatibilities identified in Step 3 will <br />likely be resolved. For instanc.e~ certain water 'users <br />may decide that they can achieve adequately satisfying <br />benefits. while modifyillg their current water use, or fu~ <br />ture expectations. On the Roanoke River in North Car- <br />olilta~ The Nature Conservancy has proposed nlodifi- <br />catlOllS to hydropower dam operations to alleviate un-' <br />naturally long floods ,dlLIing the growing season that. <br />inlpact floodplain ecosystems. The .pl.oposed modifi- <br />cations are expected to result ill hydropower generation <br />losses of only --2-S%~ The danl operators- have indi... <br />cated that this. level of reduction is probably acceptable. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.