Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table 3f Recent projects, in which restoration of some component(s) of natural flow regimes has occurred or been proposed <br />for specific ecological benefits. - <br /> <br />Location <br />Trinity River. CA <br /> <br />Truckee River, CA <br /> <br />Flow component(s) <br /> <br />Mimic timing and magnitude of peak <br />flow <br /> <br />Ecological purpose ($) <br /> <br />Reference ' <br /> <br />Rejuvenate in-channel gravel habitats; restore Barinaga 1996~ <br />early riparian succession; provide migration . <br />flows for juvenile salmon <br /> <br />Restore riparian trees. especially cottonwoods Klotz and Swanson <br />1997 <br /> <br />Mimic timing, magnitude. and duration <br />of peak flowJ and its rate of change <br />during recession <br /> <br />Owens River, CA Increase base flows: partially restore <br />overbank flows <br /> <br />Rush Creek. CA (and other Increase mJnimum flows <br />tributarfes to Mono Lake) <br /> <br />Restore riparian vegetation and habitat for <br />native fIShes and non..native brown trout . <br /> <br />Restore riparian vegetation and habitat for <br />waterfowl and non. native fishes <br /> <br />Oldman River and tributaries, Increase summer flows; reduce rates of. R.estore riparian vegetation (cottonwoods) <br />southern Alberta, Canada postflood stage decline; mimic natural and cold..water (trout) fisheries <br />flows in wet years <br /> <br />Green Riv~r, ur <br /> <br />San Juan River. UTINM <br /> <br />Gunnison Rivef't CO <br /> <br />Rio Grande River. NM <br /> <br />Pecos River, NM <br /> <br />. . Colorado River, AZ <br /> <br />Bill Williams River, AZ <br />(proposed) <br /> <br />Pemigewasset River, NH <br /> <br />Roanoke River. VA <br /> <br />Kissimmee River. FL <br /> <br />Hill and Platts in <br />press <br /> <br />LADWP 1995 <br /> <br />Rood et al. 1995 <br /> <br />Mimic timing and duration of peak flow Recovery .of endangered fish species; enhan~e Stanford 1994 <br />and duration and timing of nonpeak other native fishes <br />flows; reduce rapid baseftow fluctu.. <br />ations from hydropower generation <br /> <br />Mimic magnitude. timing, and duration Recovery of endangered tlsh species _b <br />of peak flow; restore low winter <br />basetlows <br /> <br />Mimic magnitude. timing. and duration Recovery of endangered fish species <br />of peak flow; mimic duration and t1~ng <br />of nonpe~ flows <br /> <br />Mimic timing and duration of flood.. <br />pl~n inundation <br /> <br />Regulate duration and magnitude of <br />summer irrigation releases to mimic <br />spawning flow II spikes": maintain <br />minimum flows <br /> <br />Mimic magnitude and tim~n8 <br /> <br />Mimic natural flood peak timing <br />and duration <br /> <br />Reduce frequency (Le.. to no more <br />than natural frequency) of high flows <br />during summer low-flow season; reduce <br />rate of change between low and high <br />flows durl~g hydropower cycles <br /> <br />, Restore more natural patterning of <br />monthly flows in spring; reduce rate of <br />change between low and high flows <br />during hydropower cycles <br /> <br />MImic magnitude, .duration. rate of <br />change, and tinting of high- and low- <br />flow periods ' <br /> <br />Ecosystem processes (e,g,~ nitrogen flux; <br />microbial ~ctivity. ~tter decomposition) <br /> <br />Determine spawning and habitat needs <br />for threatened fish species <br /> <br />Restore habitat ~or endangered fish species <br />and scour riparian zone . <br /> <br />Promote establishment of native trees <br /> <br />Enhance native Atlantic sal~on recovery <br /> <br />Increased reproduction of striped bass <br /> <br />.Restore floodplain inundation to recover <br />wetland functions; reestablish in-channel <br />ha.bitats for fish and other aquatic species <br /> <br />IIJ, Polos, 1997J personal communication, US Fish & Wildlife Service. Arcatat CA~ <br />bF. PfeiferJ 1997. personal communication. US Fish & Wildlife Service. Grand ]unctiont CO. <br /> <br />wood trees (Klotz and Swanson <br />1997) . <br /> <br />primarily on one or a few species <br />that live in the wetted river channel. <br />Most of these methods have the nar- <br />row intent of establishing minimum <br />allowable flows. The simplest make <br />use of easily analyzed flow data, of <br />assumptions about the regional simi- <br />larity of rivers, and of professional <br /> <br />Recent approaches to- . <br />streamflow management <br /> <br />Methods to estim.ate. environmental <br />flow requirem.ents for rivers focus <br /> <br />December 1997 <br /> <br />_b <br /> <br />MalleS et at. 1995 <br /> <br />Robertson 1997 <br /> <br />Collier et 31. 1997 <br /> <br />USCO-E 1996 <br /> <br />FERC 1995 <br /> <br />Rulifson and Manooch <br />1993 <br /> <br />Toth 1995 <br /> <br />opinions of the minimal flow needs <br />for certain fish species (e.g.t Larson <br />1981). <br />A more sophisticated assessment <br />of how changes in river flow affect <br />aquatic habitat is provided by the <br />Instream Flow Incremental Method- <br />ology (IFIM; Bovee and Milhous <br /> <br />779 <br />