My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD11151
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1
>
FLOOD11151
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:12:12 AM
Creation date
12/26/2007 3:45:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Jefferson
Arapahoe
Basin
South Platte
Title
Chatfield Reallocation Study: Meeting Minutes 08/24/2005
Date
8/24/2005
Prepared For
Meeting Participants
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Meeting Summary
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- 3 - <br /> <br />Tetra Tech Report <br /> <br />Water Quality <br />. The work group has been meeting on water quality issues. The work group includes modelers and <br />interested parties. <br />. There are various water quality models the study can use, and the costs increase with complexity. There <br />was a recent conference cal between the Corps and Tetra Tech, and they agreed to make these minutes <br />available to the group. <br />. According to Russ Claymore, total phosphorus and total maximum daily loads for Chatfield are of <br />interest. A low to mid-level water quality model wouldn't address E. coli/fecal coliform issues. <br />. State Parks stated that Chatfield had been shut down in the past for water quality issues to avoid health <br />risks to water skiers and swimmers. <br />. A HEC 21 model is being developed for the project. That model was preferred because of cost. A higher <br />end model could cost on the order of $100 or more if that becomes necessary. The current budget is <br />$43,000 for water quality modeling. <br />. Terry Baus reminded the group that a high level water quality model might be warranted depending on <br />certain requirements. The group should consider this and investigate the need for a higher level model. <br /> <br />Rare Plant Surveys <br />. There was an initial inventory in 1998. Last year another inventory was conducted to assess habitat and <br />endangered plants, namely the Ute Ladies Tresses and the Colorado butterfly plant. Tetra Tech found <br />suitable sites and indicator species but no signs of these plants. This fall they will do another report as <br />well and this should satisfy the requested three years of inventory. <br />. Denver Botanic Gardens offered assistance in providing some sort of wetlands mitigation if needed. <br /> <br />Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Progress <br />. Tetra Tech has prepared a draft "purpose and need" for the project. They have drafted sections of the <br />affected environment. They are working on the alternatives chapter and the public involvement chapter. <br />The general public will not have access to the document until drafted next year. Water users are <br />cooperating agencies with the Corps, and therefore will be able to see "purpose and need" and other <br />sections as they are finished. <br /> <br />No Action Alternative <br />. Audubon Society wanted to make sure that conservation and impacts of conservation are discussed as <br />well. <br /> <br />Downstream Cooperative (DS Coop) Update <br /> <br />WRDA Bill Update - Terry Baus <br />. No recent action on the WRDA bill and the proposed language that creates a nexus between the <br />Chatfield Reservoir Reallocation Study and environmental restoration. <br />. Congress is currently in recess. Phil Bangert is Denver's lobbyist in Washington D.C. Terry stated that <br />they have been working with Diana DeGette and Ken Salazaar and will take it up after Labor Day. <br />. One ofthe considerations with respect to environmental add-on authorization is whether or not the <br />Downstream Group would have input to the Corps analyses for patterned releases that would benefit the <br />environment along the study reach. There would be a potential cost savings to water users for quantified <br />environmental benefits. <br />. Ralph Roza and Marty Timmerwilke (Corps) assisted Denver with original legislative drafting regarding <br />the environmental restoration add-on for Chatfield. Both the House and Senate have approved versions <br />of the WRDA Bill. The two will come together, possibly this fall, to agree on one final Bill for <br />potential approval. <br /> <br />Flood Protection . Water Project Planning and Finance. Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation Planning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.